Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444717›Full record

ReviewObstetric medicine2022

Paraganglioma in pregnancy: A case series and literature review.

Jade Eccles-Smith, Stephanie Hopkins, Jennifer Conn, Stephanie Johnston, Rebecca Szabo, Sarah Price, Alison Nankervis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Successful delivery in the setting of SDHB metastatic paraganglioma.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jade Eccles-SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2970-2677
Stephanie HopkinsDepartment of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer ConnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville Victoria, Australia.
Stephanie JohnstonUniversity Hospital, Geelong Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca SzaboDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-0978
Sarah PriceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville Victoria, Australia.
Alison NankervisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville Victoria, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUDeakin University · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms which are often catecholamine-secreting and associated with familial syndromes. Described here are three women with a variety of pathology: isolated secretory paraganglioma diagnosed in pregnancy, secretory metastatic paraganglioma in pregnancy and non-secretory metastatic paraganglioma in pregnancy. Whilst paragangliomas are associated with morbidity and mortality during pregnancy, good maternal and fetal outcomes can be achieved through individualised care within the context of a multidisciplinary team. Although paragangliomas are associated with morbidity and mortality in pregnancy, good maternal and fetal outcomes can be achieved through individualised care within the context of a multidisciplinary team.

Indexed as

catecholamineshypertensionParagangliomapregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35444717
PMCPMC9014550
OpenAlexW3156665463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.