Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444706›Full record

ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2021

The Reliability and Test-Retest Stability of the Treatment Perception Questionnaire (TPQ) in the Oncology Field: A Pilot Study.

Federica Sancassiani, Sara Gambino, Jutta Lindert, Lapo Sali, Irene Pinna, Giulia Origa, Giulia Cossu, Mario Scartozzi, Antonio Preti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federica SancassianiDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Sara GambinoDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Jutta LindertUniversity of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer, Emden, Germany.
Lapo SaliDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Irene PinnaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Giulia OrigaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Giulia CossuDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Mario ScartozziDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Antonio PretiDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients' satisfaction is an indicator of technical, instrumental, environmental, and interpersonal aspects of care. It shows how much the health service "as a whole organization" meets the patients' psychosocial expectations and if the health professionals combine their technical competence with relational skills. The Treatment Perception Questionnaire (TPQ) is a brief instrument developed in the United Kingdom for research with substance abuse disorder populations. The present study aimed at evaluating the reliability and test-retest stability of the TPQ Italian translation in a sample of patients with solid and blood cancers. Methods: The TPQ was administered to 263 people with solid and blood cancers. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a subgroup of 116 participants who completed the TPQ again after 3 months. Results: The reliability of TPQ was good. Cronbach's alpha: 0.83 (95%CI: 0.79-0.86), 0.66 (0.59-0.72), 0.71 (0.65-0.769), respectively, in the total test, and in subscales on "staff perception", and "program perception". Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (0.77-0.87). The mean difference between the first and the second assessment was 1.0 (SD = 7.1; 95% CI -0.35 to 2.33). By plotting the differences and the means of the two assessments, 5/116 cases (4.3%) were outside the upper and lower limits of agreement. Conclusions: This study points out good reliability and test-retest stability of the TPQ in the oncology field. The TPQ can be used to assess variation over time about satisfaction with care in patients with oncological diseases, favoring the identification of unmet patients' needs about the quality of the service.

Indexed as

AssessmentOncologyPsycho-oncologyPsychosocial healthSatisfaction with careValidation study

Identifiers

PMID35444706
PMCPMC8985465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.