Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444666›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022

Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Common Induction Therapies for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Kang Li, Yanqiu Yu, Yuan Gao, Fei Zhao, Zheng Liang, Junjie Gao

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lupus Nephritis from Pathogenesis to New Therapies: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kang LiDepartment of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Yanqiu YuDepartment of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Yuan GaoDepartment of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Fei ZhaoDepartment of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Zheng LiangDepartment of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Junjie GaoDepartment of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Cangzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety (infection events) between rituximab (RTX), tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CYC) as induction therapies in lupus nephritis (LN). Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception up to December 9, 2021. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine the direct and indirect evidence of different drugs for LN patients. The pooled relative effects were shown using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: Nineteen studies (1,566 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were selected in the present study. The network meta-analysis reported that no statistically significant differences were found in partial remission (PR) and infection among the four drugs. RTX showed a significantly higher complete remission (CR) than MMF (OR = 2.60, 95% CrI = 1.00-7.10) and seemed to be more effective than CYC (OR = 4.20, 95% CrI = 1.70-14.00). MMF had a better CR than CYC (OR = 1.60, 95% CrI = 1.00-3.20). TAC presented a better overall response than CYC (OR = 3.70, 95% CrI = 1.20-12.00). Regarding CR and overall response, the maximum surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were 96.94% for RTX and 80.15% for TAC. The maximum SUCRA value of infection reaction was 74.98% for RTX and the minimum value was 30.17% for TAC, respectively. Conclusions: RTX and TAC were the most effective drugs for induction remission in LN. Among the four drugs, TAC had the lowest probability of infection, and RTX showed the highest probability of experiencing an infection. This meta-analysis could not conclude about other adverse events.

Indexed as

Lupus NephritisBayes TheoremCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMycophenolic AcidRituximabTacrolimusTreatment OutcomeCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidRituximabTacrolimusBayesian network meta-analysislupus nephritismycophenolate mofetilrituximabtacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID35444666
PMCPMC9013779
OpenAlexW4225338130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.