ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022
Integrating Evolutionary, Cultural, and Computational Psychiatry: A Multilevel Systemic Approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Entangled Autopoiesis: Reframing Psychotherapy and Neuroscience Through Cognitive Science and Systems Engineering.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- The role of clinicians in the looping effect: epistemic injustices and looping breaks.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- 5E Mental Health? Notes on an emerging style of thought.Transcultural psychiatry · 2025Article
- Active Inference in Psychology and Psychiatry: Progress to Date?Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Innovation at the Intersection: Emerging Translational Research in Neurology and Psychiatry.Cells · 2024Article
- Unpacking "the social": a cultural-ecosocial systems approach.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024Article
- Digital Being: social media and the predictive mind.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024Article
- Cultural poetics of illness and healing.Transcultural psychiatry · 2023Article
- Do subtle cultural differences sculpt face pareidolia?Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Restoring the missing person to personalized medicine and precision psychiatry.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Lifeworlds in pain: a principled method for investigation and intervention.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023Review
- The Inventory of Nonordinary Experiences (INOE): Evidence of validity in the United States and India.PloS one · 2023Article
- A cultural-ecosocial systems view for psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Integration and Causality in Enactive Approaches to Psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes an integrative perspective on evolutionary, cultural and computational approaches to psychiatry. These three approaches attempt to frame mental disorders as multiscale entities and offer modes of explanations and modeling strategies that can inform clinical practice. Although each of these perspectives involves systemic thinking, each is limited in its ability to address the complex developmental trajectories and larger social systemic interactions that lead to mental disorders. Inspired by computational modeling in theoretical biology, this paper aims to integrate the modes of explanation offered by evolutionary, cultural and computational psychiatry in a multilevel systemic perspective. We apply the resulting Evolutionary, Cultural and Computational (ECC) model to Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) to illustrate how this integrative approach can guide research and practice in psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.