Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444519›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2022

Gold In-and-Out: A Toolkit for Analyzing Subcellular Distribution of Immunogold-Labeled Membrane Proteins in Freeze-Fracture Replica Images.

Debbie Guerrero-Given, Seth L Goldin, Connon I Thomas, Skylar A Anthony, Diego Jerez, Naomi Kamasawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Presynaptic αNeuron · 2025
    Article
  3. Higher-order transient structures and the principle of dynamic connectivity in membrane signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Higher-order transient membrane protein structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Debbie Guerrero-GivenThe Imaging Center and Electron Microscopy Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, United States.
Seth L GoldinThe Imaging Center and Electron Microscopy Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, United States.
Connon I ThomasThe Imaging Center and Electron Microscopy Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, United States.
Skylar A AnthonyThe Imaging Center and Electron Microscopy Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, United States.
Diego JerezThe Imaging Center and Electron Microscopy Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, United States.
Naomi KamasawaThe Imaging Center and Electron Microscopy Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, United States.
Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience · USImaging Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integral membrane proteins such as ion channels, transporters, and receptors shape cell activity and mediate cell-to-cell communication in the brain. The distribution, quantity, and clustering arrangement of those proteins contribute to the physiological properties of the cell; therefore, precise quantification of their state can be used to gain insight into cellular function. Using a highly sensitive immunoelectron microscopy technique called sodium dodecyl sulfate-digested freeze-fracture replica immunogold labeling (SDS-FRL), multiple membrane proteins can be tagged with different sizes of immunogold particles at once and visualized two-dimensionally. For quantification, gold particles in the images must be annotated, and then different mathematical and statistical methods must be applied to characterize the distribution states of proteins of interest. To perform such analyses in a user-friendly manner, we developed a program with a simple graphical user interface called Gold In-and-Out (GIO), which integrates several classical and novel analysis methods for immunogold labeled replicas into one self-contained package. GIO takes an input of particle coordinates, then allows users to implement analysis methods such as nearest neighbor distance (NND) and particle clustering. The program not only performs the selected analysis but also automatically compares the results of the real distribution to a random distribution of the same number of particles on the membrane region of interest. In addition to classical approaches for analyzing protein distribution, GIO includes new tools to analyze the positional bias of a target protein relative to a morphological landmark such as dendritic spines, and can also be applied for synaptic protein analysis. Gold Rippler provides a normalized metric of particle density that is resistant to differences in labeling efficiency among samples, while Gold Star is useful for quantifying distances between a protein and landmark. This package aims to help standardize analysis methods for subcellular and synaptic protein localization with a user-friendly interface while increasing the efficiency of these time-consuming analyses.

Indexed as

freeze-fracture replica immunogold labelingGUI (graphical user interface)image analysisimmunogold particlestoolkit

Identifiers

PMID35444519
PMCPMC9014018
OpenAlexW4226309506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.