Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444518›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2022

Comparison of Resting-State Functional MRI Methods for Characterizing Brain Dynamics.

Eric Maltbie, Behnaz Yousefi, Xiaodi Zhang, Amrit Kashyap, Shella Keilholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sharp and smooth state transitions during resting state brain dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatiotemporal Network Dynamics Reveal Alzheimer's Disease Progression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. On null models for temporal small-worldness in brain dynamics.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric MaltbieThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Health Sciences Research Building, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Behnaz YousefiThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Health Sciences Research Building, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Xiaodi ZhangThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Health Sciences Research Building, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Amrit KashyapThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Health Sciences Research Building, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Shella KeilholzThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Health Sciences Research Building, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Contribution of Ultra Low Frequency LFPs to Functional MRIR01NS078095 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KEILHOLZ, SHELLA D · 2012 to 2022
$3.4M
Spatiotemporal signatures of neural activity and neurophysiology in the BOLD signalR01MH111416 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KEILHOLZ, SHELLA D · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111416NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) exhibits time-varying patterns of functional connectivity. Several different analysis approaches have been developed for examining these resting-state dynamics including sliding window connectivity (SWC), phase synchrony (PS), co-activation pattern (CAP), and quasi-periodic patterns (QPP). Each of these approaches can be used to generate patterns of activity or inter-areal coordination which vary across time. The individual frames can then be clustered to produce temporal groupings commonly referred to as "brain states." Several recent publications have investigated brain state alterations in clinical populations, typically using a single method for quantifying frame-wise functional connectivity. This study directly compares the results of k-means clustering in conjunction with three of these resting-state dynamics methods (SWC, CAP, and PS) and quantifies the brain state dynamics across several metrics using high resolution data from the human connectome project. Additionally, these three dynamics methods are compared by examining how the brain state characterizations vary during the repeated sequences of brain states identified by a fourth dynamic analysis method, QPP. The results indicate that the SWC, PS, and CAP methods differ in the clusters and trajectories they produce. A clear illustration of these differences is given by how each one results in a very different clustering profile for the 24s sequences explicitly identified by the QPP algorithm. PS clustering is sensitive to QPPs with the mid-point of most QPP sequences grouped into the same single cluster. CAPs are also highly sensitive to QPPs, separating each phase of the QPP sequences into different sets of clusters. SWC (60s window) is less sensitive to QPPs. While the QPPs are slightly more likely to occur during specific SWC clusters, the SWC clustering does not vary during the 24s QPP sequences, the goal of this work is to improve both the practical and theoretical understanding of different resting-state dynamics methods, thereby enabling investigators to better conceptualize and implement these tools for characterizing functional brain networks.

Indexed as

Brain MappingConnectomeAlgorithmsBrainCluster AnalysisHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingco-activation patterns (CAPs)dynamic functional connectivityk-means clusteringphase synchronyquasi-periodic pattern (QPP)resting-state fMRIsliding window correlation

Identifiers

PMID35444518
PMCPMC9013751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.