Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444492›Full record

ReviewGreen chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC2022

A perspective on developing solid-phase extraction technologies for industrial-scale critical materials recovery.

Aaron Brewer, Justyna Florek, Freddy Kleitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron BrewerDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry - Functional Materials, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna Währinger Strasse 42 1090 Vienna Austria aaronbrewer5@gmail.com freddy.kleitz@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-6660
Justyna FlorekDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry - Functional Materials, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna Währinger Strasse 42 1090 Vienna Austria aaronbrewer5@gmail.com freddy.kleitz@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8891-2474
Freddy KleitzDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry - Functional Materials, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna Währinger Strasse 42 1090 Vienna Austria aaronbrewer5@gmail.com freddy.kleitz@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-4180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical materials (CMs) are a group of elements that have been determined to be important for the modern economy, but which may face current or potential supply limitations. Some examples of metals that have received the CM designation include the rare earth elements, indium, gallium, and lithium. The last decade has seen a major push for the development of new and improved technologies for the recovery and purification of CMs from various traditional and non-traditional resources in an effort to diversify supply. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is one broad category of these experimental extraction technologies. SPE involves the application of a solid material to preferentially retain in the solid phase one or more specific components of an aqueous solution, leaving the other components behind in the aqueous phase. A wide range of different sorbents has been used for SPE, and many offer significant potential advantages, including low cost, low environmental impact, and high customizability. Hierarchically porous silica monoliths are one example of a cutting-edge sorbent that provides a durable, high surface area foundation that can be functionalized with a variety of targeted ligands for the selective extraction of specific CMs. Despite impressive recent advances in SPE, there remain areas for improvement that are common across the discipline. To demonstrate the practical viability of these innovative CM recovery systems, future SPE studies would benefit from devoting additional focus to the scalability of their material, as well as from focusing on real-world feedstocks and conducting techno-economic analyses and environmental impact studies.

Identifiers

PMID35444492
PMCPMC8979348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.