ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiological evaluation of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) possess the risk of missing microscopic metastasis. We commenced laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Lap-PAN) on patients with LACC for surgical staging in 2016. We assessed the feasibility of Lap-PAN in patients with LACC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 31 patients with LACC who were staged at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 IIB to IVA without enlargement of the para-aortic lymph nodes who underwent radiation therapy in our hospital between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. The postoperative outcomes of Lap-PAN were analyzed, and distinct parameters for each patient, including sites of recurrence and disease-free survival, were compared between the Lap-PAN (n = 12) and no surgery (n = 19) groups. Results: The average operation time for Lap-PAN was 167 min, and the estimated blood loss was less than 50 ml in all patients. There were no perioperative complications. The average number of excised lymph nodes was 25, and no pathological metastases were observed. There was no difference in disease-free survival rates between the Lap-PAN and no surgery groups (p = 0.42). During the follow-up period, there were two cases of recurrence in the cervix in the Lap-PAN group, and three and four cases of lung and para-aortic lymph node recurrence, respectively in the no-surgery group. Conclusions: Lap-PAN was safely performed as a pretherapeutic staging method for LACC without worsening patient prognosis. Although Lap-PAN requires a high level of skill, it may be a method to avoid excessive radiation for LACC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.