ArticleNature2022
Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford.
Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From grassroots to strategy: advancing laboratory sustainability at Utrecht university.RSC advances · 2026Article
- A habitat-based approach to reporting the direct impacts of an organization on biodiversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Impact factors for quantifying country-level terrestrial biodiversity intactness footprints (IBIF).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Towards positive net outcomes for biodiversity, and developing safeguards to accompany headline biodiversity indicators.npj biodiversity · 2025Article
- Quantifying the carbon footprint of conference travel: the case of NMR meetings.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- An introduction to key ecological concepts, financial opportunities, and risks underpinning aspirations for nature positive.Bioscience · 2024Article
- 'Nature positive' must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- UK health researchers' considerations of the environmental impacts of their data-intensive practices and its relevance to health inequities.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Drivers and constraints to environmental sustainability in UK-based biobanking: balancing resource efficiency and future value.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- The paradox of the life sciences: How to address climate change in the lab: How to address climate change in the lab.EMBO reports · 2023Article
- The environmental impact of data-driven precision medicine initiatives.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35444313What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.