Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444305›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2022

Causal mapping of human brain function.

Shan H Siddiqi, Konrad P Kording, Josef Parvizi, Michael D Fox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Linking Invasive and Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shan H SiddiqiCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. shsiddiqi@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0967-9289
Konrad P KordingDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Josef ParviziDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-7948
Michael D FoxCenter for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Personalized circuit-based neuromodulation targets for depressionK23MH121657 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SIDDIQI, SHAN · 2020 to 2024
$978k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH121657NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH127717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mapping human brain function is a long-standing goal of neuroscience that promises to inform the development of new treatments for brain disorders. Early maps of human brain function were based on locations of brain damage or brain stimulation that caused a functional change. Over time, this approach was largely replaced by technologies such as functional neuroimaging, which identify brain regions in which activity is correlated with behaviours or symptoms. Despite their advantages, these technologies reveal correlations, not causation. This creates challenges for interpreting the data generated from these tools and using them to develop treatments for brain disorders. A return to causal mapping of human brain function based on brain lesions and brain stimulation is underway. New approaches can combine these causal sources of information with modern neuroimaging and electrophysiology techniques to gain new insights into the functions of specific brain areas. In this Review, we provide a definition of causality for translational research, propose a continuum along which to assess the relative strength of causal information from human brain mapping studies and discuss recent advances in causal brain mapping and their relevance for developing treatments.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesNeurosciencesBrainBrain MappingHumansNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID35444305
PMCPMC9387758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.