Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2022
Recognising undernutrition in a community hospital: the nursing judgement is insufficient.
Observational study in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStandardised nutritional screening methods improve the rate of recognising older patients with undernutrition, which is strongly encouraged in hospitals and residential settings. Therefore, our study compared the rates of identifying undernutrition before and after introducing the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA®) in a community hospital.
methodsThis was a single-centre, retrospective, observational before-after study. Participants were subjects aged 65 years or older, admitted to a community hospital from May 2018 to December 2020. The nursing assessment at admission included the MNA® from January 2020. The prevalence of undernutrition gathered by nursing diagnoses from 2018 to 2019 was compared with data obtained using the MNA® in 2020. Then, a confirmatory analysis was conducted to compare the prevalence of undernutrition in 2020 when both nursing diagnoses and the MNA® were used.
resultsWe analysed data of approximately 316 patients (238 before and 78 after introducing the MNA®). Overall, results showed that 47.1% (n = 149) of the patients were undernourished. As observed, the prevalence of undernutrition was 38.6% (n = 92) in 2018-2019 and 73.1% (n = 57) in 2020 (p < 0.001). In 2020, however, 38.5% of patients (n = 30) were identified as undernourished using the MNA® but not using nursing diagnoses. Therefore, the correlation between these two methods was poor (Pearson's correlation 0.169, p = 0.14).
conclusionIdentifying elderly patients with undernutrition significantly increased after introducing the MNA®. Undernutrition is a common condition that should be systematically screened using a validated tool to activate personalised nutritional interventions promptly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.