Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444261›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Synthetic bacterial community derived from a desert rhizosphere confers salt stress resilience to tomato in the presence of a soil microbiome.

Lucas Schmitz, Zhichun Yan, Martinus Schneijderberg, Martijn de Roij, Rick Pijnenburg, Qi Zheng, Carolien Franken, Annemarie Dechesne, Luisa M Trindade, Robin van Velzen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Principles for Rigorous Design and Application of Synthetic Microbial Communities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Biofilm synergy byBiofilm · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lucas Schmitz *Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Zhichun Yan *Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7445-6981
Martinus SchneijderbergLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Martijn de RoijLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-9650
Rick PijnenburgLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Qi ZhengLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Carolien FrankenLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Annemarie DechesneLaboratory of Plant Breeding, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Luisa M TrindadeLaboratory of Plant Breeding, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Robin van VelzenBiosystematics, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6444-7608
Ton BisselingLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-8786
Rene GeurtsLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. rene.geurts@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-2289
Xu ChengLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Cluster of Plant Developmental Biology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. xu.cheng@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0693-7147

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 14220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root bacterial microbiome is important for the general health of the plant. Additionally, it can enhance tolerance to abiotic stresses, exemplified by plant species found in extreme ecological niches like deserts. These complex microbe-plant interactions can be simplified by constructing synthetic bacterial communities or SynComs from the root microbiome. Furthermore, SynComs can be applied as biocontrol agents to protect crops against abiotic stresses such as high salinity. However, there is little knowledge on the design of a SynCom that offers a consistent protection against salt stress for plants growing in a natural and, therefore, non-sterile soil which is more realistic to an agricultural setting. Here we show that a SynCom of five bacterial strains, originating from the root of the desert plant Indigofera argentea, protected tomato plants growing in a non-sterile substrate against a high salt stress. This phenotype correlated with the differential expression of salt stress related genes and ion accumulation in tomato. Quantification of the SynCom strains indicated a low penetrance into the natural soil used as the non-sterile substrate. Our results demonstrate how a desert microbiome could be engineered into a simplified SynCom that protected tomato plants growing in a natural soil against an abiotic stress.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSolanum lycopersicumBacteriaCrops, AgriculturalPlant RootsRhizosphereSalt StressSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID35444261
PMCPMC9296610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.