Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444196›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Home range size and habitat quality affect breeding success but not parental investment in barn owl males.

Robin Séchaud, Kim Schalcher, Bettina Almasi, Roman Bühler, Kamran Safi, Andrea Romano, Alexandre Roulin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Barn owls exert top-down effects on the abundance and behavior of rodent pests.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fatal Traps in Western Barn Owls' (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Embryonic methionine triggers post-natal developmental programming in Japanese quail.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Food supply and provisioning behavior of parents: Are small hoopoe nestlings condemned to die?Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robin SéchaudDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. robin.sechaud@unil.ch.
Kim SchalcherDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bettina AlmasiSwiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, 6204, Sempach, Switzerland.
Roman BühlerSwiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, 6204, Sempach, Switzerland.
Kamran SafiMax Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, Department of Migration, Am Obstberg 1, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.
Andrea RomanoDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alexandre RoulinDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_173178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life-history theory predicts that parents should balance their limited resources to maximize lifetime fitness, limiting their investment in current reproduction when the fitness value of current progeny is lower than that gained by producing offspring in the future. Here, we examined whether male barn owls (Tyto alba) breeding in low-quality habitats increased their parental effort to successfully complete offspring rearing or limited their investment by paying a fitness cost while saving energy for the future. We equipped 128 males with GPS devices between 2016 and 2020 to collect information on home range size, habitat composition, food provisioning rate to the brood and nightly distances covered. We also recorded nestlings' growth and survival, as well as males' body mass variation and future reproductive success. Males living in lower-quality habitats exploited bigger home ranges compared to individuals whose nests were settled in prey-rich habitats. They fed their brood less frequently, while covering longer nightly distance, resulting in a slower growth of late-hatched nestlings and ultimately in a lower fledging success. As males did not differ in body mass variation or future reproductive success our findings suggest that males hunting in home ranges with less prey-rich structures do not jeopardize future reproduction by investing disproportionately larger resources to compensate for their current low home range quality.

Indexed as

StrigiformesAnimalsEcosystemFemaleHoming BehaviorMaleReproduction

Identifiers

PMID35444196
PMCPMC9021228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.