Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444187›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2022

Gender gap in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Stefanie T Jost, Lena Strobel, Alexandra Rizos, Philipp A Loehrer, Keyoumars Ashkan, Julian Evans, Franz Rosenkranz, Michael T Barbe, Gereon R Fink, Jeremy Franklin and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Differentiating between the impact of sex and gender in Parkinson's disease: utilising these to advance current understanding and care practices.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Sex and gender-related differences in neurological diseases: current challenges and recommendations for clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefanie T Jost *Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. stefanie.jost@uk-koeln.de.
Lena Strobel *Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexandra RizosParkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Philipp A LoehrerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-2156
Keyoumars AshkanParkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Julian EvansDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK.
Franz RosenkranzDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael T BarbeDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Gereon R FinkDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8230-1856
Jeremy FranklinInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anna SauerbierDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christopher NimskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8216-9410
Afsar SattariUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Humanities, Cologne, Germany.
K Ray ChaudhuriParkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-0505
Angelo AntoniniParkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurosciences (DNS), University of Padua, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1040-2807
Lars TimmermannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Pablo Martinez-MartinCenter for Networked Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.
Monty SilverdaleDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK.
Elke KalbeUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies & Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Interventions (CeNDI), Cologne, Germany.
Veerle Visser-VandewalleDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Haidar S DafsariDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. haidar.dafsari@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-4233
EUROPAR and the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society Non-Motor Parkinson’s Disease Study Group
University of Cologne · DEKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEBiomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases · ESKing's College London · GBPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown less access to deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) in women compared to men raising concerns about a potential gender gap resulting from nonclinical factors or gender differences in clinical efficacy for postoperative quality of life (QoL), motor, and nonmotor symptoms (NMS) outcomes. This was a cross-sectional and a longitudinal, prospective, observational, controlled, quasi-experimental, international multicenter study. A total sample size of 505 consisted of 316 consecutively referred patients for DBS indication evaluation at the University Hospital Cologne (01/2015-09/2020) and 189 consecutively treated patients at DBS centers in the University Hospitals Cologne and Marburg, Salford's Royal Hospital Manchester, and King's College Hospital London. In the cross-sectional cohort, we examined gender proportions at referral, indication evaluations, and DBS surgery. In the longitudinal cohort, clinical assessments at preoperative baseline and 6-month follow-up after surgery included the PD Questionnaire-8, NMSScale, Scales for Outcomes in PD-motor scale, and levodopa-equivalent daily dose. Propensity score matching resulted in a pseudo-randomized sub-cohort balancing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between women with PD and male controls. 316 patients were referred for DBS. 219 indication evaluations were positive (women n = 102, respectively n = 82). Women with PD were disproportionally underrepresented in referrals compared to the general PD population (relative risk [RR], 0.72; 95%CI, 0.56-0.91; P = 0.002), but more likely to be approved for DBS than men (RR, 1.17; 95%CI, 1.03-1.34; P = 0.029). Nonetheless, their total relative risk of undergoing DBS treatment was 0.74 (95%CI, 0.48-1.12) compared to men with PD. At baseline, women had longer disease duration and worse dyskinesia. Exploring QoL domains, women reported worse mobility and bodily discomfort. At follow-up, all main outcomes improved equally in both genders. Our study provides evidence of a gender gap in DBS for PD. Women and men with PD have distinct preoperative nonmotor and motor profiles. We advocate that more focus should be directed toward the implementation of gender equity as both genders benefit from DBS with equal clinical efficacy. This study provides Class II evidence of beneficial effects of DBS in women with PD compared to male controls.

Identifiers

PMID35444187
PMCPMC9021281
OpenAlexW4224218818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.