Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444049›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2022

Statins are associated with a large reduction in all-cause mortality in women from a cardiac outpatient population.

Sophie H Bots, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Milena Jancev, Monika Hollander, Igor I Tulevski, Leonard Hofstra, G Aernoud Somsen, Hester M den Ruijter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophie H BotsLaboratory for Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4483-5582
N Charlotte Onland-MoretJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care Complex Genetics Section, Universitair Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Milena JancevLaboratory for Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Monika HollanderJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care Complex Genetics Section, Universitair Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Igor I TulevskiCardiology Centers of the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leonard HofstraCardiology Centers of the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G Aernoud SomsenCardiology Centers of the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hester M den RuijterLaboratory for Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands h.m.denruijter-2@umcutrecht.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUncertainty about the benefit of (high-intensity) statins for women remains due to under-representation of women in primary prevention trials and scarcity of sex-stratified data. This study evaluates the sex-specific relation between statin treatment and survival and the additional benefit of high-intensity statins.

methodsElectronic health record data from 47 801 patients (17 008 statin users and 30 793 non-users) without prior cardiovascular disease were extracted from thirteen Dutch outpatient cardiology clinics. Patients prescribed statins at baseline were propensity-score matched to those eligible for statin therapy (low-density lipoprotein >2.5 mmol/L) without a statin prescription. Statins were divided into low-intensity and high-intensity according to Dutch guidelines. Mortality data were obtained via linkage to the national mortality registry. Cox regression was used to evaluate the relationship between statin prescription and intensity and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

resultsPropensity score matching created a cohort of 8631 statin users and 8631 non-users. 35% of women and 28% of men received a low-intensity statin. The beneficial effect of statins on both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was stronger in women (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.74 and HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.71, respectively) than in men (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08, respectively). High-intensity statins conferred modest protection against all-cause mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.00) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98) in both sexes.

conclusionsThe protective effect of primary prevention statins was stronger in women than men for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. High-intensity statins conferred a modest additional benefit in both sexes. Statins seem to be effective regardless of treatment intensity, especially in women.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOutpatientsPropensity ScoreHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsElectronic Health RecordsEPIDEMIOLOGYSTATINS

Identifiers

PMID35444049
PMCPMC9021779
OpenAlexW4224214080

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.