Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444030›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2023

Impact of pictorial health warning labels on smoking beliefs and perceptions among waterpipe smokers: an online randomised cross-over experimental study.

Rime Jebai, Taghrid Asfar, Rima Nakkash, Sara Chehab, Wensong Wu, Zoran Bursac, Wasim Maziak

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effects of Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Intention to Quit Waterpipe in Lebanon: A Mediation Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rime JebaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9265-1323
Taghrid AsfarDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1133-9723
Rima NakkashDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sara ChehabDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Wensong WuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Arts, Sciences & Education, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Zoran BursacDepartment of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Wasim MaziakDepartment of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA wmaziak@fiu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6126-8420
Florida International University · USAmerican University of Beirut · LBGeorge Mason University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

The FIU Research Center in a Minority Institution (FIU-RCMI)U54MD012393 · NIMHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Diana Azzam · 2017 to 2026
$32.1M
Developing and testing health warning labels on the ENDS deviceR01DA051836 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI ASFAR, TAGHRID, MAZIAK, WASIM · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
The effect of menthol on ENDS users' dependence, respiratory, and toxicants emission outcomesR01DA055937 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Wasim Maziak · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Translating evidence and building capacity to support waterpipe control in the Eastern MediterraneanR01TW010654 · FIC · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI ASFAR, TAGHRID, MAZIAK, WASIM · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Training Program in Adolescent Substance Use Disorders and Co-Occurring Mental and Behavioral DisordersT32DA043449 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez · 2019 to 2026
$1.7M
Advancing addiction research and capacity to guide tobacco control in the EasternR01DA035160 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MAZIAK, WASIM · 2012 to 2017
$1.5M
Understanding tobacco flavor effects on waterpipe smokers’ experiences and exposuresR01DA042477 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MAZIAK, WASIM · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
Assessing the effect of nicotine reduction on ENDS user's addiction and exposuresR01DA053587 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MAZIAK, WASIM · 2021 to 2023
$1.2M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010654NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035160NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042477NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051836NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053587NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA055937NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA043449NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWaterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) has substantially increased among young people in Lebanon, who perceive WTS as safer than cigarettes. Health warning labels (HWLs) can inform the adverse effects associated with smoking. Thus, their application to waterpipe offers a favourable policy to limit WTS epidemic. This study assessed the effectiveness of pictorial HWLs and their placements on waterpipe parts (device, tobacco and charcoal package) on several communication outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a randomised cross-over experimental study among 276 waterpipe smokers (aged 18-34) between 13 and 26 August 2021. Participants observed three conditions: pictorial HWLs on tobacco packages, pictorial HWLs on three parts of the waterpipe (device, tobacco and charcoal package) and text only on tobacco package in random order. Participants completed baseline and postexposure assessments evaluating HWL effectiveness on attention, reaction, attitudes and beliefs, perceived effectiveness of HWLs and intention to quit WTS. Planned comparisons using Friedman test followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test for multiple comparisons were conducted.

resultsCompared with text only, pictorial HWLs elicited greater attention (p=0.011), higher cognitive elaboration (p=0.021), perceived message effectiveness (p=0.007), negative affect reactions (p<0.01) and greater psychological reactance (p=0.01). No significant differences were found for most communication outcomes between pictorial HWLs on three parts of the waterpipe compared with tobacco package only.

conclusionsPictorial HWLs on tobacco package were superior to text only for several communication outcomes. These findings provide strong evidence for potential implementation of pictorial HWLs on waterpipe tobacco packages to increase smokers' awareness of the health effects of WTS and correct false safety perceptions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeProduct LabelingWater Pipe SmokingAdolescentAdultHealth PromotionHumansSmokersTobacco ProductsYoung Adultcessationlow/middle income countrynon-cigarette tobacco productspackaging and labelling

Identifiers

PMID35444030
PMCPMC9582042
OpenAlexW4224290139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.