Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443978›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2022

Follow-up after gestational diabetes: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practices.

Jane Hyldgaard Nielsen, Kirsten Fonager, Jette Kolding Kristensen, Charlotte Overgaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane Hyldgaard NielsenPublic Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark jhy@ucn.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-3984
Kirsten FonagerDepartment of Social Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jette Kolding KristensenCenter for General practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Charlotte OvergaardPublic Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen whose pregnancies are complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are approximately eight times more likely to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although regular participation in follow-up screening increases the chance of early detection of diabetes, participation rates are often suboptimal. A better understanding of general practice as a key contextual setting for screening could help inform the development and adoption of, for example, electronic reminder interventions to support women's participation.

aimTo explore the perspectives of GPs and relevant staff members engaged in early detection of diabetes after gestational diabetes in order to identify barriers to and facilitators of follow-up screening. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative interview study undertaken in general practices in the North Denmark Region.

methodBased on a purposive sample strategy, 18 semi-structured interviews of 12 GPs and six staff members, who were either nurses or midwives, were analysed using a reflexive thematic analytical approach.

resultsThe following three main themes were formulated: (1) challenges of addressing women's risk; (2) prioritisation of early detection of diabetes; and (3) system influence on clinical procedures.

conclusionFollow-up screening was facilitated by knowledge of guidelines. Professional collaboration and adaptation support were found to lead to successful implementation of guidelines in general practice. Supporting GPs and their staff's reflection and discussion of ways to engage in communication and decisionmaking processes with women is, however, important; it was found to create an important barrier to follow-up screening. Overall, the findings can help inform the future development of interventions to increase uptake.

Indexed as

diabetes, gestationaldiabetes mellitus, type 2disease preventionfollow-up screeninggeneral practiceprimary healthcarequalitative health research

Identifiers

PMID35443978
PMCPMC9680740
OpenAlexW4224280071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.