Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443967›Full record

Trial reportClinical medicine (London, England)2022

Implementation of virtual reality technology to decrease patients' pain and nervousness during colonoscopies: a prospective randomised controlled single-blinded trial.

Qizhi Liu, Yunhua Zang, Wei Zang, Wenpeng Cai, Weiwei Li, Ya'nan Guo, Cheng Xin, Xiaohuang Tu

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06766162 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality and Endoscopic Mucosal and Submucosal Dissection: a Patient Centred Experience "VREMRESD"

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College Hospital NHS TrustRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsVR, Virtual Reality Pain Distraction, Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionArmsVirtual reality pain distraction, Standard analgesia and sedation
NCT07538687 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality for Patients During Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled64ConditionsEnd Stage Renal Disease on DialysisArmsVirtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qizhi LiuShanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yunhua ZangSix One Primary School, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZangMinistry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Wenpeng CaiNaval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Weiwei LiMinistry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Ya'nan GuoMinistry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Cheng XinNaval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaohuang TuShanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China tuxiaohuang@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved patient satisfaction in endoscopy is worthy of study as it is an invasive and potentially uncomfortable procedure. There is growing literature on patient satisfaction assessment in endoscopy as part of improving quality assurance. This study aimed to determine whether virtual reality (VR) technology can decrease patients' pain and nervousness during colonoscopies.

methodsPatients enrolled without sedation were randomly categorised into groups that watched VR (VR group; n=58) and those that did not watch VR (control group; n=59). The primary outcomes were pain score and skin conductance. Secondary endpoints included heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial pressures, overall patient satisfaction, willingness to repeat the procedure, the difficulty of the procedure, the procedure duration, and bowel preparation.

resultsThe median (interquartile range (IQR)) pain scores were 7 (6-8) and 5 (4-6) in the control and VR groups, respectively (p<0.001). The median (IQR) skin conductance values after colonoscope insertion were 0.660 (0.490-0.840) and 0.390 (0.280-0.600) in the control and VR groups, respectively (p<0.001). Overall, patient satisfaction was significantly improved with the use of VR, along with a significant reduction in the difficulty perceived by the endoscopist.

conclusionVR technology helped to reduce patients' pain and nervousness and to improve patients' satisfaction during colonoscopies.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityAnxietyColonoscopyHumansPainProspective StudiesTechnologycolonoscopypainsatisfactionvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35443967
PMCPMC9135071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.