Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443869›Full record

ArticleSAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance2022

'I can't go to her when I have a problem': sexuality communication between South African adolescent girls and young women and their mothers.

Zoe Duby, Wilmé Verwoerd, Katja Isaksen, Kim Jonas, Kealeboga Maruping, Janan Dietrich, Ashleigh Lovette, Caroline Kuo, Catherine Mathews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Zoe DubyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7615-8152
Wilmé VerwoerdDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences in the School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Katja IsaksenCentre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kim JonasHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4469-6674
Kealeboga MarupingHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Janan DietrichHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1949-3138
Ashleigh LovetteDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-7291
Caroline KuoDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Catherine MathewsHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5368-1127
South African Medical Research Council · ZABrown University · USUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001150PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parent-adolescent sexuality communication, the process in which parents and their adolescent children discuss sexuality and sexual and reproductive health, is a key component for adolescents' protective behaviours. Open communication with parents, particularly mothers, enables informed sexual and reproductive health (SRH) decision-making amongst adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). As part of a qualitative study evaluating a South African combination HIV prevention intervention for AGYW, we explored perspectives on SRH communication among AGYW and mothers of AGYW, and the effects of the intervention on sexuality communication as perceived by AGYW, mothers of AGYW, intervention facilitators and implementers, and community leaders. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with 185 AGYW aged 15-24 years who had participated in the intervention, seven mothers of AGYW intervention recipients, 14 intervention facilitators, six community leaders, and 12 intervention implementers. Key themes that emerged in analysis were (1) Barriers to Sexuality communication, (2) Implications of Gaps in Sexuality Communication, and (3) Addressing Barriers to Sexuality communication. Barriers to sexuality communication included inability or unwillingness to discuss sex, a generation gap, proscriptive socio-cultural guidelines, and mothers' discomfort, lack of knowledge and self-efficacy, and fear of encouraging promiscuity. AGYW described making poorly-informed SRH decisions alone, expressing a desire for more open communication with and support from parents/mothers. Framed within the social cognitive theory, these findings can help to guide efforts to address barriers around parent-adolescent sexuality communication, inform interventions aimed at targeting SRH issues amongst AGYW, such as unintended pregnancy and HIV, and support meaningful engagement of parents in supporting AGYW in navigating pathways to achieving their SRH goals.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMothersAdolescentChildCommunicationFemaleHumansPregnancySexual BehaviorSexualitySouth AfricaAdolescent girls and young womenparentssexuality communicationSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID35443869
PMCPMC9037167
OpenAlexW4224213833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.