Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443704›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2022

Social and housing indicators of dengue and chikungunya in Indian adults aged 45 and above: Analysis of a nationally representative survey (2017-18).

Winnie Paulson, Naveen Kumar Kodali, Karuppusamy Balasubramani, Rashi Dixit, Savitha Chellappan, Sujit Kumar Behera, Praveen Balabaskaran Nina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Winnie PaulsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Tiruvarur, India.
Naveen Kumar KodaliDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Tiruvarur, India.
Karuppusamy BalasubramaniDepartment of Geography, School of Earth Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Tiruvarur, India.
Rashi DixitDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Tiruvarur, India.
Savitha ChellappanIndian Council of Medical Research- National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Belagavi, India.
Sujit Kumar BeheraDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Tiruvarur, India.
Praveen Balabaskaran NinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Tiruvarur, India. praveen@cutn.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-0738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue and chikungunya (CHIKV) are the two major vector-borne diseases of serious public health concern in India. Studies on socioeconomic and housing determinants of dengue and CHIKV at a pan-India level are lacking. Here, we took advantage of the recently carried out Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) carried out across all the states and Union Territories of India to study the social indicators of dengue and CHIKV in India.

methodsLASI-1 (2017-2018) data on the self-reported period prevalence of dengue and CHIKV from 70,932 respondents aged ≥45 years were used for this analysis. The state-wise distribution of dengue and CHIKV was mapped. Prevalence was estimated for each study variable, and the difference was compared using the χ2 test. The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of the socioeconomic and housing variables for dengue and CHIKV were estimated using the multiple logistic regression model.

resultsUrban residence is the major socio-economic indicator of dengue and CHIKV (dengue AOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.18-2.11; CHIKV AOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.49). The other notable indicator is wealth; rich respondents have higher odds of dengue and CHIKV. Adults older than 54 years and those with high school education and above are associated with a lower likelihood of dengue and CHIKV. In addition, CHIKV is associated with scheduled and forward castes, households with improper toilet facilities, open defecation, and kutcha house type.

conclusionsDespite the limitation that the data is only from adults ≥ 45, this analysis provides important insights into the socioeconomic and housing variables associated with higher odds of dengue and CHIKV in India. Understanding these determinants may assist in the national planning of prevention and control strategies for dengue and CHIKV.

Indexed as

LASIRisk factors of dengue and chikungunyaSocial determinants of chikungunyaSocial determinants of dengue

Identifiers

PMID35443704
PMCPMC9022351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.