Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443676›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Diclofenac-hyaluronate conjugate (diclofenac etalhyaluronate) intra-articular injection for hip, ankle, shoulder, and elbow osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Toshikazu Kubo, Tsukasa Kumai, Hiroyasu Ikegami, Kazuyuki Kano, Megumi Nishii, Takayuki Seo

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toshikazu KuboKyoto Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsukasa KumaiFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroyasu IkegamiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery (Ohashi), School of Medicine, Toho University, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuyuki KanoClinical Development Department, Research & Development Division, Seikagaku Corporation, 1-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0005, Japan.
Megumi NishiiClinical Development Department, Research & Development Division, Seikagaku Corporation, 1-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0005, Japan.
Takayuki SeoClinical Development Department, Research & Development Division, Seikagaku Corporation, 1-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0005, Japan. clin_6131033@seikagaku.co.jp.
Seikagaku Corporation (Japan) · JPToho University Ohashi Medical Center · JPWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of diclofenac etalhyaluronate (DF-HA) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, ankle, shoulder, or elbow.

methodsIn this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in Japan, Japanese patients aged ≥20 years diagnosed with OA of the hip, ankle, shoulder, or elbow were randomly assigned 1:1 to DF-HA 30 mg or placebo (citric acid-sodium citrate buffered solution). Subjects received three injections of the study drug in each joint cavity every 4 weeks and were assessed for 12 weeks after the first injection. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in a diary-based 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain over 12 weeks, analyzed for each joint. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded, and morphological changes in each joint were evaluated radiographically.

resultsThe study drug (DF-HA vs placebo) was injected into 90, 60, 90, or 50 subjects with OA of the hip, ankle, shoulder, or elbow (46 vs 44, 30 vs 30, 45 vs 45, and 25 vs 25, respectively). The group differences in the mean change from baseline in the pain NRS over 12 weeks were - 0.81 (95% confidence interval: - 1.48 to - 0.13), - 0.07 (- 1.03 to 0.89), 0.15 (- 0.48 to 0.78), and 0.61 (- 0.41 to 1.62) for the hip, ankle, shoulder, and elbow joints, respectively, with statistically significant differences observed only in the hip joint. The change from baseline in the hip joint was greater with DF-HA than placebo at all time points from Weeks 1-12. No clinically significant adverse events or radiographic changes were observed.

conclusionsIntra-articularly administered DF-HA for hip OA produced a rapid response and was safe, with analgesia maintained for 12 weeks when administered every 4 weeks.

trial registrationJapicCTI-173,678 (First registered date: 21 August 2017).

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeAnkleDiclofenacDouble-Blind MethodElbowHumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularPainShoulderTreatment OutcomeDiclofenacdiclofenac etalhyaluronateHyaluronic AcidAnkleDiclofenac etalhyaluronateElbowHipHyaluronanIntra-articular injectionNSAIDsOsteoarthritisShoulder

Identifiers

PMID35443676
PMCPMC9022275
OpenAlexW4224274129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.