Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443661›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Cross-sectional study on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and determinants in healthcare students: interdisciplinary trainings on vaccination are needed.

Sylvain Gautier, Domitille Luyt, Benjamin Davido, Marie Herr, Thomas Cardot, Anne Rousseau, Djillali Annane, Elisabeth Delarocque-Astagneau, Loïc Josseran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sylvain GautierFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France. sylvain.gautier@aphp.fr.
Domitille LuytFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Benjamin DavidoFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Marie HerrFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Thomas CardotFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Anne RousseauFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Djillali AnnaneFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Elisabeth Delarocque-AstagneauFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Loïc JosseranFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo ensure the success of COVID-19 vaccination, public authorities need to have the support of the entire population and build vaccine confidence. Identifying and understanding the determinants of vaccine acceptance is essential for conducting vaccine strategy. The aim was to estimate vaccine hesitancy among healthcare students in France and to investigate the associated factors.

methodsA web-based cross-sectional study was conducted in a large French University in greater Paris area, among 4927 healthcare students from the different training courses such as medicine studies, midwifery studies, physiotherapy studies, nurse studies and others health studies. The study was conducted between January 21 and February 8, 2021 based on a questionnaire including 25 single or multiple-choice questions, made using the free software Limesurvey. The link of the questionnaire was distributed to the students by the teachers and the student associations. The SAGE group definition of vaccine hesitancy was used. All estimates were weighted using the gender and training courses category of all healthcare students registered for the 2020-2021 year. Crude and adjusted weighted odds ratio (wOR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were estimated using logistic regression.

resultsA total of 1465 healthcare students answered. A proportion of 44.5% (95%CI = [41.7-47.3]) of them were considered as hesitant. Women were more hesitant (50.9, 95%CI = [48.0-53.9]) than men (21.6, 95%CI = [15.2-28.0]). Vaccine hesitancy was significantly associated with gender (wOR = 0.27, 95%CI = [0.18-0.39]) and training courses: medical students were less likely to be hesitant than students in the common and first year of several health studies (wOR = 0.48, 95%CI = [0.33-0.70]) while nursing students were more than 5 times more likely to be hesitant (wOR = 5.20, 95%CI = [3.71-7.28]). Students who did an internship during the epidemic (wOR = 0.53, 95%CI = [0.41-0.69]) and who downloaded the mobile contact-tracing mobile app "TousAntiCovid" (wOR = 0.34, 95%CI = [0.26-0.44]) were significantly less likely to be hesitant.

conclusionsOverall vaccine hesitancy among healthcare students was high, substantial differences were found between training courses. To reduce these disparities, interdisciplinary lectures on vaccines for all healthcare students may be implemented and evaluated.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalVaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19Education, medicalUniversitiesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID35443661
PMCPMC9020813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.