ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Hip stability parameters with dual mobility, modular dual mobility and fixed bearing in total hip arthroplasty: an analytical evaluation.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modular dual mobility articulation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty: lights and shadows.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Beyond jump distance: modular dual mobility versus single mobility cups in robotic total hip arthroplasty - simulation of hip kinematics and impingement.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Catastrophic Failure of a Prosthetic Femoral Stem due to Component Malposition: A Case Report.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
- Functional and Safety Outcomes of Third-Generation Zimmer Biomet G7Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of functional outcomes and complications in dual mobility versus large femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Minimum Two-Year Outcomes of the Zimmer G7 Modular Dual Mobility Cup in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Survivorship, Complications, Clinical and Radiographic Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes and Survivorship of Three Modular Dual Mobility Implants in Primary Total Hip Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Influence of radial clearance on Tresca stress in AlScientific reports · 2025Article
- Dual mobility cups reduce dislocation in isolated cup revision.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Observational
- Bibliometric Analysis of Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip & pelvis · 2025Article
- Dual-mobility tripod cup for revision hip arthroplasty: long-term (five to fourteen years) evaluation of a new generation cementless implant.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- What is the rate of successful closed reduction of dislocated dual mobility cups following complex revision hip arthroplasty?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Is Modular Dual Mobility Superior to Standard Bearings for Reducing Dislocation Risk after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Comparative Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Modern Dual Mobility Implants in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Stability, Survival, and Ion Safety Evaluation: The Comprehensive Review.JB & JS open accessReview
- Impact of Cup Anteversion and Hip-Spine Relationship on Femoral Neck Notching in Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUse of dual mobility (DM) in total hip arthroplasty has gained popularity due to the ability to reduce dislocation through increased jumping distance and impingement-free arc of movement. Recently, modular dual mobility (modDM) systems were introduced to give the possibility to use DM with standard metal-backed shells, however few has been studied to date regarding how jumping distance and the center of rotation change with modDM. The objective of this study was to evaluate, through analytical simulation, how jumping distance, center of rotation and arc of movement change between DM and standard cups with modDM or fixed bearings (FB).
methods3D-models of DM and standard press-fit cups with modDM or FB liners were used to simulate DM, modDM and FB implant configurations, matched for same cup size, according to same cup position and different femoral head diameters. Jumping distance was calculated and center of rotation lateralization and oscillation angles were measured for each size of these three implant configurations.
resultsJumping distance with modDM was reduced by -3.9 mm to -8.6 mm in comparison with DM, from 48 to 64 mm size, but resulted comparable to polyethylene 36 mm FB and increased by + 1.1 mm and + 1.4 mm than ceramic 36 and 40 mm FBs for sizes > 54 mm. ModDM lateralized the center of rotation up to + 2.5 mm and + 4.0 mm in comparison with DM and FBs, respectively. Oscillation angle with modDM resulted higher than + 16°, + 23°, + 17° and + 14° in comparison to DM, 28 mm, 32 mm and 36 mm FB cups, respectively, for 56 mm cup size.
conclusionsAccording to its specific design, modDM might change hip stability parameters in comparison to DM, worsening jumping distance and center of rotation position, but increasing arc of movement. As not restoring stability parameters in the same fashion, modDM implants should be properly used when DM cups are not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.