Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443647›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Mapping evidence on knowledge of breast cancer screening and its uptake among women in Ghana: a scoping review.

Agani Afaya, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Somin Sang, Vida Nyagre Yakong, Richard Adongo Afaya, Jinhee Shin, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agani AfayaCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-2999
Abdul-Aziz SeiduCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Douglas, Australia. abdul-aziz.seidu@stu.ucc.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-9054
Somin SangCollege of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-3240
Vida Nyagre YakongDepartment of Preventive Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8014-2989
Richard Adongo AfayaDepartment of Midwifery and Women's Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4616-7642
Jinhee ShinMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-895X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFemale breast cancer is currently the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally with an estimated 2.3 million new cases in 2020. Due to its rising frequency and high mortality rate in both high- and low-income countries, breast cancer has become a global public health issue. This review sought to map literature to present evidence on knowledge of breast cancer screening and its uptake among women in Ghana.

methodsFive databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were searched to identify relevant published studies between January 2012 and August 2021 on knowledge of breast cancer screening and its uptake among women. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and the six-stage model by Arksey and O'Malley were used to select and report findings.

resultsOf the 65 articles retrieved, 14 records were included for synthesis. The review revealed varied knowledge levels and practices of breast cancer screening among women across a few regions in Ghana. The knowledge level of women on breast cancer screening was high, especially in breast cancer screening practice. Breast cancer screening practice among women was observed to be low and the most identified barriers were lack of technique to practice breast self-examination, having no breast problem, lack of awareness of breast cancer screening, and not having breast cancer risk. The results further showed that good knowledge of breast cancer screening, higher educational level, increasing age, physician recommendation, and household monthly income were enabling factors for breast cancer screening uptake.

conclusionThis review showed varied discrepancies in breast cancer screening uptake across the regions in Ghana. Despite the benefits of breast cancer screening, the utilization of the screening methods across the regions is very low due to some varied barriers from the different regions. To increase the uptake of breast cancer screening, health workers could employ various strategies such as community education and sensitization on the importance of breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGhanaHumansPovertyBreast cancerGhanaScoping reviewscreening

Identifiers

PMID35443647
PMCPMC9022278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.