Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443644›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Identification of a pyroptosis-related prognostic signature in breast cancer.

Hanghang Chen, Haihua Luo, Jieyan Wang, Jinming Li, Yong Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanghang ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No.1023 Shatai South Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Haihua LuoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No.1023 Shatai South Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Jieyan WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No.1023 Shatai South Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Jinming LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No.1023 Shatai South Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China. jmli@smu.edu.cn.
Yong JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No.1023 Shatai South Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China. jiang48231@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between pyroptosis and cancer is complex. It is controversial that whether pyroptosis represses or promotes tumor development. This study aimed to explore prognostic molecular characteristics to predict the prognosis of breast cancer (BRCA) based on a comprehensive analysis of pyroptosis-related gene expression data.

methodsRNA-sequcing data of BRCA were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Ominibus (GEO) datasets. First, pyroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and tumor tissues were identified from the TCGA database. Based on the DEGs, 1053 BRCA patients were divided into two clusters. Second, DEGs between the two clusters were used to construct a signature by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model, and the GEO cohort was used to validate the signature. Various statistical methods were applied to assess this gene signature. Finally, Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was employed to compare the enrichment scores of 16 types of immune cells and 13 immune-related pathways between the low- and high-risk groups. We calculated the tumor mutational burden (TMB) of TCGA cohort and evaluated the correlations between the TMB and riskscores of the TCGA cohort. We also compared the TMB between the low- and high-risk groups.

resultsA total of 39 pyroptosis-related DEGs were identified from the TCGA-breast cancer dataset. A prognostic signature comprising 16 genes in the two clusters of DEGs was developed to divide patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, and its prognostic performance was excellent in two independent patient cohorts. The high-risk group generally had lower levels of immune cell infiltration and lower activity of immune pathway activity than did the low-risk group, and different risk groups revealed different proportions of immune subtypes. The TMB is higher in high-risk group compared with low-risk group. OS of low-TMB group is better than that of high-TMB group.

conclusionA 16-gene signature comprising pyroptosis-related genes was constructed to assess the prognosis of breast cancer patients and its prognostic performance was excellent in two independent patient cohorts. The signature was found closely associated with the tumor immune microenvironment and the potential correlation could provide some clues for further studies. The signature was also correlated with TMB and the mechanisms are still warranted.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansPrognosisPyroptosisTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorBreast CancerPrognosisPyroptosisTumor immune microenvironmentTumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID35443644
PMCPMC9019977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.