Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35443623›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2022

Contextual factors influencing advance care planning in home care: process evaluation of the cluster-randomised controlled trial STADPLAN.

Katharina Silies, Tilman Huckle, Rieke Schnakenberg, Änne Kirchner, Almuth Berg, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Gabriele Meyer, Falk Hoffmann, Sascha Köpke

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina SiliesNursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. Katharina.silies@uksh.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0591-1976
Tilman HuckleNursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Rieke SchnakenbergDepartment for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 140, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.
Änne KirchnerMedical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Almuth BergMedical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Juliane Köberlein-NeuCenter for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Rainer-Gruenter-Straße 21, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany.
Gabriele MeyerMedical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Falk HoffmannDepartment for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 140, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.
Sascha KöpkeInstitute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Köln, Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Wuppertal · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe STADPLAN study is a cluster-randomised controlled trial including 27 home care services in Germany. It assesses the effect of an advance care planning (ACP) intervention delivered by trained nurses to older care-dependent patients. Patients received two ACP conversations and an information brochure. Nurses were educated through a two-day programme and topic guides structuring the conversations. Objectives of the process evaluation were to determine: [1] whether the intervention was implemented as planned, [2] which change mechanisms were observed, [3] whether targeted process outcomes were achieved and [4] in which way contextual factors influenced the implementation process.

methodsThe process evaluation is based on a mixed methods approach following the recommendations of the UK-MRC framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. Qualitative and quantitative assessments were developed and analysed guided by a logic model comprising intervention, participants, mechanisms of change and context factors. The results of the main trial will be published elsewhere.

resultsEducational programme and topic guides were mostly implemented as planned and resulted in motivation, knowledge, and perceived competencies to facilitate ACP conversations in nurses. Deviances in the performance of ACP conversations indicated patients' varied individual needs, but also obstacles like reluctance of patients and caregivers to participate actively and time constraints of nurse facilitators. Patients and caregivers reported increased awareness of ACP, planning and other activities indicating that targeted process outcomes could be achieved. The relevance of multifaceted contextual factors acting as barriers or facilitators for the engagement in ACP interventions on the individual, organisational and macro level was evident.

conclusionsThe process evaluation elicits obstacles and achievements of the ACP intervention. The logic model organised a plethora of mixed methods data into a holistic picture of multifaceted results. Nurses as ACP facilitators in home care can fulfil a crucial initiating role based on a trusting relationship with their patients. To support older care-dependent people's ACP engagement, access should be simplified. Furthermore, education for nurse facilitators and sufficient resources for service provision are needed. Independent of monetary reimbursement, healthcare providers must respect patients' choice for or against any ACP intervention. ETHICS AND

trial registrationApproved by the Ethics Committees of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Ref.-No. 2019-045), Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg (Ref.-No. 2019-024), and University of Lübeck (Ref.-No. 19-080). GERMAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER: DRKS00016886. Registered retrospectively 04/06/2019, first participant included 29/05/2019.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningHome Care ServicesGermanyHumansMotivationRetrospective StudiesAdvance care planningAmbulatory careComplex interventionHome care servicesLogic modelMixed methodsNursingProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35443623
PMCPMC9020149
OpenAlexW4224242892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.