Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442952›Full record

ReviewPloS one2022

Large-scale investigations of Neolithic settlement dynamics in Central Germany based on machine learning analysis: A case study from the Weiße Elster river catchment.

Jan Johannes Miera, Karsten Schmidt, Hans von Suchodoletz, Mathias Ulrich, Lukas Werther, Christoph Zielhofer, Peter Ettel, Ulrich Veit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan Johannes MieraInstitute for Pre- and Early History, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0482-9508
Karsten SchmidteScience-Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0337-3024
Hans von SuchodoletzInstitute of Geography, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Mathias UlrichInstitute of Geography, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1337-252X
Lukas WertherInstitute for Prehistoric and Medieval Archaeology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christoph ZielhoferInstitute of Geography, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Peter EttelInstitute for Pre- and Early History, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Ulrich VeitInstitute for Pre- and Early History, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4060-1199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper investigates potentials and challenges during the interpretation of prehistoric settlement dynamics based on large archaeological datasets. Exemplarily, this is carried out using a database of 1365 Neolithic sites in the Weiße Elster river catchment in Central Germany located between the southernmost part of the Northern German Plain and the Central Uplands. The recorded sites are systematically pre-processed with regard to their chronology, functional interpretation and spatial delineation. The quality of the dataset is reviewed by analyzing site distributions with respect to field surveys and modern land use. The Random Forests machine learning algorithm is used to examine the impact of terrain covariates on the depth of sites and pottery preservation. Neolithic settlement dynamics are studied using Site Exploitation Territories, and site frequencies per century are used to compare the intensity of land use with adjacent landscapes. The results show that the main trends of the Neolithic settlement dynamics can be derived from the dataset. However, Random Forests analyses indicate poor pottery preservation in the Central Uplands and a superimposition of Neolithic sites in the southernmost part of the Northern German Plain. Throughout the Neolithic the margins between soils on loess and the Weiße Elster floodplain were continuously settled, whereas only Early and Late Neolithic land use also extended into the Central Uplands. These settlement patterns are reflected in the results of the Site Exploitation Territories analyses and explained with environmental economic factors. Similar with adjacent landscapes the Middle Neolithic site frequency is lower compared to earlier and later periods.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyRiversGermanyMachine LearningSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID35442952
PMCPMC9020700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.