Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442903›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Predicting COVID-19 Symptoms From Free Text in Medical Records Using Artificial Intelligence: Feasibility Study.

Josefien Van Olmen, Jens Van Nooten, Hilde Philips, Annet Sollie, Walter Daelemans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From structures to systems: towards a model of ethical healthcare.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Josefien Van OlmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-1887
Jens Van NootenComputational Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistics Research Centre, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-5709
Hilde PhilipsDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9503-470X
Annet SollieDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-3526
Walter DaelemansComputational Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistics Research Centre, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9832-7890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic medical records have opened opportunities to analyze clinical practice at large scale. Structured registries and coding procedures such as the International Classification of Primary Care further improved these procedures. However, a large part of the information about the state of patient and the doctors' observations is still entered in free text fields. The main function of those fields is to report the doctor's line of thought, to remind oneself and his or her colleagues on follow-up actions, and to be accountable for clinical decisions. These fields contain rich information that can be complementary to that in coded fields, and until now, they have been hardly used for analysis.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a prediction model to convert the free text information on COVID-19-related symptoms from out of hours care electronic medical records into usable symptom-based data that can be analyzed at large scale.

methodsThe design was a feasibility study in which we examined the content of the raw data, steps and methods for modelling, as well as the precision and accuracy of the models. A data prediction model for 27 preidentified COVID-19-relevant symptoms was developed for a data set derived from the database of primary-care out-of-hours consultations in Flanders. A multiclass, multilabel categorization classifier was developed. We tested two approaches, which were (1) a classical machine learning-based text categorization approach, Binary Relevance, and (2) a deep neural network learning approach with BERTje, including a domain-adapted version. Ethical approval was acquired through the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Tropical Medicine and the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Antwerpen (ref 20/50/693).

resultsThe sample set comprised 3957 fields. After cleaning, 2313 could be used for the experiments. Of the 2313 fields, 85% (n=1966) were used to train the model, and 15% (n=347) for testing. The normal BERTje model performed the best on the data. It reached a weighted F1 score of 0.70 and an exact match ratio or accuracy score of 0.38, indicating the instances for which the model has identified all correct codes. The other models achieved respectable results as well, ranging from 0.59 to 0.70 weighted F1. The Binary Relevance method performed the best on the data without a frequency threshold. As for the individual codes, the domain-adapted version of BERTje performs better on several of the less common objective codes, while BERTje reaches higher F1 scores for the least common labels especially, and for most other codes in general.

conclusionsThe artificial intelligence model BERTje can reliably predict COVID-19-related information from medical records using text mining from the free text fields generated in primary care settings. This feasibility study invites researchers to examine further possibilities to use primary care routine data.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecoding procedureCOVID-19electronic medical recordsfeasibility studynatural language processingprecision modelprediction modelprimary carestructured registrytext mining

Identifiers

PMID35442903
PMCPMC9049643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.