Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442774›Full record

ArticlePhysiological genomics2022

Gut microbiota of wild fish as reporters of compromised aquatic environments sleuthed through machine learning.

John W Turner, Xi Cheng, Nilanjana Saferin, Ji-Youn Yeo, Tao Yang, Bina Joe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Highlighting recent impactful publications inPhysiological genomics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John W TurnerDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.
Xi ChengDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-0838-5094
Nilanjana SaferinDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.
Ji-Youn YeoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.
Tao YangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-9793
Bina JoeDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-2385-7061

Funding

Genetic, Epigenetic and Dietary Salt effects on Microbiota and HypertensionR01HL143082 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI JOE, BINA · 2018 to 2021
$2.6M
A novel model to study COVID-19 and HypertensionR21AI164449 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI JOE, BINA · 2021 to 2022
$425k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143082NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI164449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-generated negative impacts on aquatic environments are rising. Despite wild fish playing a key role in aquatic ecologies and comprising a major global food source, physiological consequences of these impacts on them are poorly understood. Here we address the issue through the lens of interrelationship between wild fish and their gut microbiota, hypothesizing that fish microbiota are reporters of the aquatic environs. Two geographically separate teleost wild-fish species were studied (Lake Erie, Ohio, and Caribbean Sea, US Virgin Islands). At each geolocation, fresh fecal samples were collected from fish in areas of presence or absence of known aquatic compromise. Gut microbiota was assessed via microbial 16S-rRNA gene sequencing and represents the first complete report for both fish species. Despite marked differences in geography, climate, water type, fish species, habitat, diet, and gut microbial compositions, the pattern of shifts in microbiota shared by both fish species was nearly identical due to aquatic compromise. Next, these data were subjected to machine learning (ML) to examine reliability of using the fish-gut microbiota as an ecomarker for anthropogenic aquatic impacts. Independent of geolocation, ML predicted aquatic compromise with remarkable accuracy (>90%). Overall, this study represents the first multispecies stress-related comparison of its kind and demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence via ML as a tool for biomonitoring and detecting compromised aquatic conditions.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceFishesMachine LearningReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Senvironmentfishmachine learningmicrobiotastress

Identifiers

PMID35442774
PMCPMC9126214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.