Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442762›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2022

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Study.

Shubo Fan, Zhongyuan Zhang, Jie Wang, Shengwei Xiong, Xiaofei Dai, Xu Chen, Zhihua Li, Guanpeng Han, Jun Zhu, Han Hao and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Systematic Review and Clinical Outcomes of new Robotic Systems in Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. [Risk factors of positive surgical margin and multifocal positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shubo FanDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Zhongyuan ZhangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Shengwei XiongDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Xiaofei DaiDepartment of Urology, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Civil Aviation Medical College of Peking University, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Xu ChenDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Zhihua LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Guanpeng HanDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Jun ZhuDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Han HaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Wei YuDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Liang CuiDepartment of Urology, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Civil Aviation Medical College of Peking University, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Cheng ShenDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Liqun ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur goal was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01) system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study was conducted from May 2021 to August 2021. Sixteen RARP procedures with the KD-SR-01 system were performed by 1 surgeon. The perioperative and followup data were prospectively recorded. Early oncologic outcomes were assessed according to surgical margin status and continence was defined as no more than 1 pad daily or urine leakage of ≤20 gm by the 24-hour pad weight test. Ergonomics were assessed with the NASA-TLX (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index).

resultsAll cases were completed successfully without conversion to traditional RARP, laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The median docking time, console time and urethrovesical anastomosis time were 5.9 (range, 2.5-11.5), 87 (range, 70-120) and 14.4 minutes (range, 12.0-25.7), respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 50 ml (range, 10-200). None of patients required intraoperative transfusion. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range, 4-10). Overall, a positive surgical margin occurred in 4 (25%) patients. No biochemical recurrence occurred within 1 month after surgery. The continence rate was 87.5% (14/16) at 1 month after catheter removal. No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred. The surgeon reported a high comfort level with a NASA-TLX global score of 22.7±3.2.

conclusionsThe KD-SR-01 system is feasible, safe and effective for management of localized prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesProstatectomyTreatment Outcomeprostatic neoplasmsroboticsrobotic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID35442762
PMCPMC12721627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.