Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442569›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2022

How Ohio's proposed abortion bans would impact travel distance to access abortion care.

Payal Chakraborty, Stef Murawsky, Mikaela H Smith, Michelle L McGowan, Alison H Norris, Danielle Bessett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. When external factors limit care options for complex fetal and neonatal diagnoses.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Feelings about abortion at time of care: Findings from an Ohio abortion facility.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The patient/physician relationship in a post-Roe world: a neonatologist viewpoint.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Payal ChakrabortyDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Stef MurawskyDepartment of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Mikaela H SmithDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Michelle L McGowanEthics Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Alison H NorrisDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Danielle BessettDepartment of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Institute for Population ResearchP2CHD058484 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYFORD, SARAH R · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSince March 2021, the Ohio legislature has been actively considering laws that would ban abortion if the United States Supreme Court overturns the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationally in 1973.

methodsWe used a national database of publicly advertised abortion facilities to calculate driving distances for Ohioans before and after the activation of proposed abortion bans. Using a legal analysis of abortion laws following the overturn of Roe, we determined which states surrounding Ohio would continue providing abortion care. We calculated distances from each Ohio county centroid to the nearest open abortion facility in three scenarios: (1) as of February 2022, (2) the best-case post-Roe scenario (two of the five surrounding states continue to offer abortion care), and (3) worst-case post-Roe scenario (no surrounding states continue to offer abortion care). We calculated population-weighted distances using county-level data about women aged 15-44 years from the 2019 American Community Survey.

resultsIn February 2022, all Ohio county centroids were at most 99 miles from an abortion facility (median = 50 miles). The best-case post-Roe scenario shows 62 of Ohio's 88 counties to be 115-279 miles away from the nearest facility (median = 146). The worst-case shows 85 counties to be 191-339 miles away from the nearest facility (median = 264). The current average population-weighted driving distance from county centroid to the nearest facility is 26 miles; the post-Roe scenarios would increase this to 157 miles (best-case) or 269 miles (worst-case).

conclusionsOhio's proposed abortion bans would substantially increase travel distances to abortion care, impacting over 2.2 million reproductive-aged Ohioans.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, LegalAdultFemaleHumansOhioPregnancySupreme Court DecisionsTravelUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35442569
PMCPMC9324164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.