Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442451›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Enrollment of Black Participants in Pivotal Clinical Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignant Neoplasms.

Samer Al Hadidi, Carolina Schinke, Sharmilan Thanendrarajan, Maurizio Zangari, Frits van Rhee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Moving Into the Future.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samer Al HadidiMyeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Carolina SchinkeMyeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Sharmilan ThanendrarajanMyeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Maurizio ZangariMyeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Frits van RheeMyeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Disparities that affect Black persons with various hematological malignant neoplasms are substantial, yet little is known about disparities related to the use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Objective: To examine the enrollment of Black participants in clinical trials that resulted in a subsequent FDA approval of CAR-T products in hematological malignant neoplasms. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was performed using publicly available data on drug products and demographic subgroups from Drugs@fda in the period of August 2017 to May 2021. Data analysis included patients with large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma who were enrolled into 7 clinical trials that investigated various CAR-T products. The study was conducted from July 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies of participation of Black participants were calculated with adjustment for disease prevalence. Results: Of the 1057 enrolled patients included in the study, CAR-T products were given to 746 patients (71%), and efficacy was reported for 729 enrolled patients (69%) across all the approved CAR-T products and indications. Most patients (1015 patients [96%]) were enrolled in the US. Black participants were included in the racial category other in the study that supported tisagenlecleucel approval in acute lymphoblastic leukemia; otherwise, their enrollment was specified either in the study publication and/or the demographic subgroup information available under the FDA product labeling information. The number of Black participants who received the CAR-T product and had reported efficacy varied between studies (range, 1-12 participants [2%-5%]). Adjusted prevalence measures showed the lowest participation to prevalence ratio of 0.2 for multiple myeloma and 0.6 for large B cell lymphoma. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that there are substantial disparities affecting Black patients across all approved CAR-T products used to treat hematological malignant neoplasms with otherwise limited effective treatment options. The study findings might aid policy discussions regarding the immediate need of regulations that enforce certain thresholds of Black patients' enrollment before granting FDA approval.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalHematologic NeoplasmsPatient ParticipationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMultiple MyelomaPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35442451
PMCPMC9021907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.