ArticleJAMA network open2022
Enrollment of Black Participants in Pivotal Clinical Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignant Neoplasms.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of sociodemographic determinants on enrollment into contemporary lymphoma clinical trials: a systematic review.The oncologist · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Racial and ethnic disparities in brain-to-vein time among patients receiving CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory DLBCL.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Equity in Neurotoxicity Care in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.Seminars in neurology · 2026Article
- Overcoming Trial Exclusion: A Multicenter Analysis of Hemodialysis Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Underwent BCMA-Directed CAR-T Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing Social Determinants of Health in Transplantation and CAR-T Recipients: Expert Panel Recommendations from the Survivorship Special Interest Group of ASTCT.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- The Improving Outcomes in Relapsed-Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: The Role of CAR T-Cell Therapy.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- New strategies for enhancing enrollment of underrepresented minorities in lymphoma clinical trials.Blood advances · 2025Review
- The role of social, economic, and medical marginalization in cancer clinical trial participation inequities: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment- Focus on CAR-T and Bispecific Antibody Therapies.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024Review
- Disparities in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from an interprofessional consensus panel.Blood cancer journal · 2024Review
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model of Outcome After B-Cell Maturation Antigen-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Observational
- Perspectives on the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.The oncologist · 2024Review
- The current socioeconomic and regulatory landscape of immune effector cell therapies.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Bringing CAR T cell therapy trials to underserved populations.Cancer cell · 2023Article
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell and Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Moving Into the Future.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Review
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells as Salvage Therapy for Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Failure.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2023Article
- Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Clinical Trials in Underrepresented Populations: A Multicenter Cohort Study of Pediatric and Young Adult Acute Lymphobastic Leukemia Patients.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2023Article
- The impact of race, ethnicity, and obesity on CAR T-cell therapy outcomes.Blood advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Disparities that affect Black persons with various hematological malignant neoplasms are substantial, yet little is known about disparities related to the use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Objective: To examine the enrollment of Black participants in clinical trials that resulted in a subsequent FDA approval of CAR-T products in hematological malignant neoplasms. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was performed using publicly available data on drug products and demographic subgroups from Drugs@fda in the period of August 2017 to May 2021. Data analysis included patients with large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma who were enrolled into 7 clinical trials that investigated various CAR-T products. The study was conducted from July 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies of participation of Black participants were calculated with adjustment for disease prevalence. Results: Of the 1057 enrolled patients included in the study, CAR-T products were given to 746 patients (71%), and efficacy was reported for 729 enrolled patients (69%) across all the approved CAR-T products and indications. Most patients (1015 patients [96%]) were enrolled in the US. Black participants were included in the racial category other in the study that supported tisagenlecleucel approval in acute lymphoblastic leukemia; otherwise, their enrollment was specified either in the study publication and/or the demographic subgroup information available under the FDA product labeling information. The number of Black participants who received the CAR-T product and had reported efficacy varied between studies (range, 1-12 participants [2%-5%]). Adjusted prevalence measures showed the lowest participation to prevalence ratio of 0.2 for multiple myeloma and 0.6 for large B cell lymphoma. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that there are substantial disparities affecting Black patients across all approved CAR-T products used to treat hematological malignant neoplasms with otherwise limited effective treatment options. The study findings might aid policy discussions regarding the immediate need of regulations that enforce certain thresholds of Black patients' enrollment before granting FDA approval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.