Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442429›Full record

SynthesisJAMA psychiatry2022

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Patients With Unipolar Depression Compared With Healthy Control Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ina Viktoria Mousten, Nina Vindegaard Sørensen, Rune Haubo B Christensen, Michael Eriksen Benros

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Changes in leukocytes and CRP in different treatments of major depression.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Clinical staging and profiling of affective disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Suicide Behavior as a Distinct Psychobiology in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Immunologic Underpinnings of Post-Stroke Depression.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ina Viktoria MoustenBiological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina Vindegaard SørensenBiological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rune Haubo B ChristensenBiological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Eriksen BenrosBiological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Depression has been associated with alterations in neurotransmitters, hormones, and inflammatory and neurodegenerative biomarkers, and biomarkers quantified in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are more likely to reflect ongoing biochemical changes within the brain. However, a comprehensive overview of CSF biomarkers is lacking and could contribute to the pathophysiological understanding of depression. Objective: To investigate differences in quantified CSF biomarkers in patients with unipolar depression compared with healthy control individuals. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for eligible trials from database inception to August 25, 2021. Study Selection: All studies investigating CSF biomarkers in individuals 18 years and older with unipolar depression and healthy control individuals were included. One author screened titles and abstracts, and 2 independent reviewers examined full-text reports. Studies that did not include healthy control individuals or included control individuals with recent hospital contacts or admissions that might affect CSF biomarker concentrations were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by 2 reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) calculated with random-effects models. A third investigator was consulted if the 2 reviewers reached different decisions or when in doubt. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quantifiable CSF biomarkers. Results: A total of 167 studies met eligibility criteria, and 97 had available data and were included in the meta-analysis. These 97 studies comprised 165 biomarkers, 42 of which were quantified in 2 or more studies. CSF levels of interleukin 6 (7 studies; SMD, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.59; I2 = 16%), total protein (5 studies; SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.72; I2 = 0%), and cortisol (2 studies; SMD, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.57; I2 = 0%) were higher in patients with unipolar depression compared with healthy control individuals, whereas homovanillic acid (17 studies; SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.14; I2 = 11%), γ-aminobutyric acid (4 studies; SMD, -0.50; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.08; I2 = 55%), somatostatin (5 studies; SMD, -1.49; 95% CI, -2.53 to -0.45; I2 = 91%), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (3 studies; SMD, -0.58; 95% CI, -0.97 to -0.19; I2 = 0%), amyloid-β 40 (3 studies; SMD, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.14 to -0.46; I2 = 0%), and transthyretin (2 studies; SMD, -0.82; 95% CI, -1.37 to -0.27; I2 = 0%) were lower. The remaining 33 biomarkers had nonsignificant results. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis point toward a dysregulated dopaminergic system, a compromised inhibitory system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity, increased neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier permeability, and impaired neuroplasticity as important factors in depression pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemBiomarkersHumansPituitary-Adrenal SystemBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35442429
PMCPMC9021989
OpenAlexW4224290533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.