Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442390›Full record

SynthesisJAMA cardiology2022

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Myocarditis in a Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents.

Øystein Karlstad, Petteri Hovi, Anders Husby, Tommi Härkänen, Randi Marie Selmer, Nicklas Pihlström, Jørgen Vinsløv Hansen, Hanna Nohynek, Nina Gunnes, Anders Sundström and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Feasibility of conducting brand-specific influenza vaccine effectiveness studies in three Nordic countries, Denmark, Finland, Sweden.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Øystein KarlstadDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Petteri HoviDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Anders HusbyDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tommi HärkänenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Randi Marie SelmerDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Nicklas PihlströmDivision of Licensing, Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jørgen Vinsløv HansenDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanna NohynekHealth Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Nina GunnesDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anders SundströmDivision of Use and Information, Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jan WohlfahrtDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tuomo A NieminenInformation Services, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Maria GrünewaldDivision of Licensing, Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hanne Løvdal GulsethDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anders HviidDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rickard LjungDivision of Use and Information, Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIMedical Products Agency · SENorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOStatens Serum Institut · DKImperial College London · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Reports of myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination have emerged. Objective: To evaluate the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by vaccine product, vaccination dose number, sex, and age. Design, Setting, and Participants: Four cohort studies were conducted according to a common protocol, and the results were combined using meta-analysis. Participants were 23 122 522 residents aged 12 years or older. They were followed up from December 27, 2020, until incident myocarditis or pericarditis, censoring, or study end (October 5, 2021). Data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, hospital diagnoses of myocarditis or pericarditis, and covariates for the participants were obtained from linked nationwide health registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Exposures: The 28-day risk periods after administration date of the first and second doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, including BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and AZD1222 or combinations thereof. A homologous schedule was defined as receiving the same vaccine type for doses 1 and 2. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident outcome events were defined as the date of first inpatient hospital admission based on primary or secondary discharge diagnosis for myocarditis or pericarditis from December 27, 2020, onward. Secondary outcome was myocarditis or pericarditis combined from either inpatient or outpatient hospital care. Poisson regression yielded adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and excess rates with 95% CIs, comparing rates of myocarditis or pericarditis in the 28-day period following vaccination with rates among unvaccinated individuals. Results: Among 23 122 522 Nordic residents (81% vaccinated by study end; 50.2% female), 1077 incident myocarditis events and 1149 incident pericarditis events were identified. Within the 28-day period, for males and females 12 years or older combined who received a homologous schedule, the second dose was associated with higher risk of myocarditis, with adjusted IRRs of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.43-2.14) for BNT162b2 and 6.57 (95% CI, 4.64-9.28) for mRNA-1273. Among males 16 to 24 years of age, adjusted IRRs were 5.31 (95% CI, 3.68-7.68) for a second dose of BNT162b2 and 13.83 (95% CI, 8.08-23.68) for a second dose of mRNA-1273, and numbers of excess events were 5.55 (95% CI, 3.70-7.39) events per 100 000 vaccinees after the second dose of BNT162b2 and 18.39 (9.05-27.72) events per 100 000 vaccinees after the second dose of mRNA-1273. Estimates for pericarditis were similar. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this large cohort study indicated that both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. For individuals receiving 2 doses of the same vaccine, risk of myocarditis was highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose. These findings are compatible with between 4 and 7 excess events in 28 days per 100 000 vaccinees after BNT162b2, and between 9 and 28 excess events per 100 000 vaccinees after mRNA-1273. This risk should be balanced against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19MyocarditisPericarditisBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19Cohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2VaccinationBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35442390
PMCPMC9021987
OpenAlexW4224244510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.