Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442203›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Patient Recruitment System for Clinical Trials: Mixed Methods Study About Requirements at Ten University Hospitals.

Kai Fitzer, Renate Haeuslschmid, Romina Blasini, Fatma Betül Altun, Christopher Hampf, Sherry Freiesleben, Philipp Macho, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Christian Gulden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Completeness of Common Data Elements for Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in Observational Databases.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ten Topics to Get Started in Medical Informatics Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kai Fitzer *Core Unit Data Integration Center, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0844-5330
Renate Haeuslschmid *Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-6749
Romina BlasiniInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-6102
Fatma Betül AltunMedical Informatics Group, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9718-1351
Christopher HampfCore Unit Data Integration Center, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-4783
Sherry FreieslebenCore Unit Data Integration Center, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-5419
Philipp MachoMedical Informatics, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-2069
Hans-Ulrich ProkoschMedical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-753X
Christian GuldenMedical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-3691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trials are the gold standard for advancing medical knowledge and improving patient outcomes. For their success, an appropriately sized cohort is required. However, patient recruitment remains one of the most challenging aspects of clinical trials. Information technology (IT) support systems-for instance, patient recruitment systems-may help overcome existing challenges and improve recruitment rates, when customized to the user needs and environment.

objectiveThe goal of our study is to describe the status quo of patient recruitment processes and to identify user requirements for the development of a patient recruitment system.

methodsWe conducted a web-based survey with 56 participants as well as semistructured interviews with 33 participants from 10 German university hospitals.

resultsWe here report the recruitment procedures and challenges of 10 university hospitals. The recruitment process was influenced by diverse factors such as the ward, use of software, and the study inclusion criteria. Overall, clinical staff seemed more involved in patient identification, while the research staff focused on screening tasks. Ad hoc and planned screenings were common. Identifying eligible patients was still associated with significant manual efforts. The recruitment staff used Microsoft Office suite because tailored software were not available. To implement such software, data from disparate sources will need to be made available. We discussed concrete technical challenges concerning patient recruitment systems, including requirements for features, data, infrastructure, and workflow integration, and we contributed to the support of developing a successful system.

conclusionsIdentifying eligible patients is still associated with significant manual efforts. To fully make use of the high potential of IT in patient recruitment, many technical and process challenges have to be solved first. We contribute and discuss concrete technical challenges for patient recruitment systems, including requirements for features, data, infrastructure, and workflow integration.

Indexed as

clinical information systemsclinical trialclinical trial recruitment support systemeHealthelectronic supportinterviewpatient recruitment systempatient screeningrecruitmentrequirementssurveyuser needs

Identifiers

PMID35442203
PMCPMC9069280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.