Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442200›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Formative Provider Testing of a New Encounter Decision Aid for Smoking Cessation: Questionnaire Study.

Herul Hollanda De Sa Neto, Ines Habfast-Robertson, Christina Hempel-Bruder, Marie-Anne Durand, Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski, Yasser Khazaal, Ivan Berlin, Kevin Selby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Herul Hollanda De Sa NetoLausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-9116
Ines Habfast-RobertsonCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1564-7678
Christina Hempel-BruderCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-9988
Marie-Anne DurandLausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1127-9348
Isabelle Jacot-SadowskiCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7047-2439
Yasser KhazaalDepartment of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8549-6599
Ivan BerlinHôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5928-5616
Kevin SelbyCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9096-0720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking cessation is an essential part of preventing and reducing the risk of smoking-associated morbidity and mortality. However, there is often little time to discuss smoking cessation in primary care. Decision aids (DAs) designed for clinic visits (encounter DAs) need to be clear, short, and concise to optimize therapeutic education, increase interaction, and improve the therapeutic alliance. Such a DA for smoking cessation could potentially improve counseling and increase the use of pharmacological treatments.

objectiveWe aimed to collect feedback on an electronic encounter DA that facilitates physician-patient interaction and shared decision-making for smoking cessation in primary care.

methodsWe developed an electronic, encounter DA (howtoquit.ch) from a paper version created by our team in 2017 following user-centered design principles. The DA is a 1-page interactive website presenting and comparing medications for tobacco cessation and electronic cigarettes. Each smoking cessation medication has a drop down menu that presents additional information, a video demonstration, and prescribing information for physicians. To test the DA, we submitted a questionnaire to approximately 20 general practitioner residents of an academic general medicine department, 5 general practitioners, and 6 experts in the field of smoking cessation. The questionnaire consisted of 4 multiple-choice and 2 free-text questions assessing the usability or acceptability of the DA, the acquisition of new knowledge for practitioners, the perceived utility in supporting shared decision-making, perceived strengths and weaknesses, and whether the participants would recommend the tool to other clinicians.

resultsIn all, 6 residents, 3 general practitioners in private practice, and 2 tobacco cessation experts completed the questionnaire (N=11), with 4 additional experts providing open-text feedback. On the 11 questionnaires, the DA was rated as practical and intuitive (mean 4.6/5), and providers felt it supported shared decision-making (mean 4.4/5), as comparisons were readily possible. Inclusion of explanatory videos was seen as a bonus. Several changes were suggested, like grouping together similar medications and adding a landing page to briefly explain the site. Changes were implemented according to end-user comments.

conclusionsThe overall assessment of the encounter DA by a group of physicians and experts was positive. The ultimate objective is to have the tool deployed and easily accessible for all to use.

Indexed as

decision aidelectronic toolshared decision-makingsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID35442200
PMCPMC9069282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.