Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442191›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Invariant neural subspaces maintained by feedback modulation.

Laura B Naumann, Joram Keijser, Henning Sprekeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Layer-specific control of inhibition by NDNF interneurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Structured flexibility in recurrent neural networks via neuromodulation.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura B NaumannModelling of Cognitive Processes, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-7349
Joram KeijserModelling of Cognitive Processes, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Henning SprekelerModelling of Cognitive Processes, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0690-3553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory systems reliably process incoming stimuli in spite of changes in context. Most recent models accredit this context invariance to an extraction of increasingly complex sensory features in hierarchical feedforward networks. Here, we study how context-invariant representations can be established by feedback rather than feedforward processing. We show that feedforward neural networks modulated by feedback can dynamically generate invariant sensory representations. The required feedback can be implemented as a slow and spatially diffuse gain modulation. The invariance is not present on the level of individual neurons, but emerges only on the population level. Mechanistically, the feedback modulation dynamically reorients the manifold of neural activity and thereby maintains an invariant neural subspace in spite of contextual variations. Our results highlight the importance of population-level analyses for understanding the role of feedback in flexible sensory processing.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsFeedbackNeural Networks, Computerblind source separationfeedbackgain modulationinvarianceneurosciencenonepopulation analysessensory processing

Identifiers

PMID35442191
PMCPMC9106332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.