ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022
Comparative study of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and introvoxel incoherent motion in assessment of pathological grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative MRI for World Health Organisation/International Society of Urological Pathology Grading of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Article
- Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for early response stratification of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor in renal cell carcinoma: an exploratory study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Multiparametric diffusion-weighted MRI for renal microstructural assessment in patients with primary aldosteronism at varying direct renin concentrations.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- MRI-based diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a deep learning classifier.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Advances in renal cancer: diagnosis, treatment, and emerging technologies.La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Development and validation of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging-based model for preoperative distinguishing nuclear grade and survival of clear cell renal cell carcinoma complicated with venous tumor thrombus.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Comparison of the monoexponential and biexponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic imaging in grading clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a case-control study.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Investigation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma grades using diffusion-relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging with optimized spatial-spectrum analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Differentiating tumour progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients: a monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential model-based DWI study.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and introvoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis of microstructural differences for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
methodsMultiple b value DWIs and IVIMs were performed in patients with 146 ccRCCs, 42 with Grade Ⅰ, 46 with Grade Ⅱ, 28 with Grade Ⅲ and 30 with Grade Ⅳ. These tumours were divided into low (Ⅰ+Ⅱ,
resultsThe mean signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of IVIM images at
conclusionIVIM parameters have better performance than ADC in differentiating ccRCC grading, given an adequate SNR of IVIM images. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 1. D values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating low/high and Ⅱ/Ⅲ ccRCC grading. 2. IVIM parameters have better performance than ADC in differentiating ccRCC grading, given an adequate SNR of IVIM images. 3. The ADC, D and D* values correlated negatively with ccRCC grading, however, f values correlated positively with ccRCC grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.