Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442085›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2022

Tumor Vascular Remodeling Affects Molecular Dissemination to Lymph Node and Systemic Leukocytes.

Meghan J O'Melia, Nathan A Rohner, Susan Napier Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meghan J O'MeliaWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nathan A RohnerGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Susan Napier ThomasWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Research Training Program Plan on Cell and Tissue Engineering (CTEng)T32GM008433 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 1991 to 2021
$7.1M
Mechanisms of impaired T-cell mechanosensing of melanoma antigensU01CA214354 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KROGSGAARD, MICHELLE, ZHU, CHENG · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
Melanoma immunotherapy targeting sentinel lymph nodesR01CA207619 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI THOMAS, SUSAN NAPIER · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
IVIS Spectrum in vivo Imaging SystemS10OD016264 · OD · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 2015 to 2015
$595k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207619NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214354NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008433NIH HHS S10 OD016264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenic and lymphangiogenic remodeling has long been accepted as a hallmark of cancer development and progression; however, the impacts of this remodeling on immunological responses, which are paramount to the responses to immunotherapeutic treatments, are underexplored. As immunotherapies represent one of the most promising new classes of cancer therapy, in this study, we explore the effects of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic normalization on dissemination of molecules injected into the tumor microenvironment to immune cells in lymph nodes draining the tumor as well as in systemically distributed tissues. A system of fluorescent tracers, size-matched to biomolecules of interest, was implemented to track different mechanisms of tumor transport and access to immune cells. This revealed that the presence of a tumor, and either angiogenic or lymphangiogenic remodeling, altered local retention of model biomolecules, trended toward normalizing dissemination to systemic organs, and modified access to lymph node-resident immune cells in manners dependent on mechanism of transport. More specifically, active cell migration by skin-derived antigen presenting cells was enhanced by both the presence of a tumor and lymphangiogenic normalization, while both angiogenic and lymphangiogenic normalization restored patterns of immune cell access to passively draining species. As a whole, this work uncovers the potential ramifications of tumor-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, along with impacts of interrogation into these pathways, on access of tumor-derived species to immune cells. Impact Statement Angiogenic and lymphangiogenic normalization strategies have been utilized clinically to interrogate tumor vasculature with some success. In the age of immunotherapy, the impacts of these therapeutic interventions on immune remodeling are unclear. This work utilizes mouse models of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic normalization, along with a system of fluorescently tagged tracers, to uncover the impacts of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis on access of tumor-derived species to immune cell subsets within various organs.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsVascular RemodelingAnimalsImmunotherapyLeukocytesLymph NodesMiceNeovascularization, PathologicTumor Microenvironmentangiogenic normalizationbiodistributiongrowth factorimmune remodelinglymphangiogenesistissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35442085
PMCPMC9508451
OpenAlexW4224229998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.