Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442027›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2022

Achieving Theory-Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling.

Wenbo Xie, Jiayan Xu, Jianfu Chen, Haifeng Wang, P Hu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Parameter Estimation of Microkinetic Models for Heterogeneous Catalysis.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Construction of Sabatier Volcanoes for COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Automated Pynta-Based Curriculum for ML-Accelerated Calculation of Transition States.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenbo XieSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5321-2494
Jiayan XuSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9897-5778
Jianfu ChenKey Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Centre for Computational Chemistry and Research Institute of Industrial Catalysis, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P. R. China.
Haifeng WangKey Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Centre for Computational Chemistry and Research Institute of Industrial Catalysis, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-5800
P HuSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6318-1051
Queen's University Belfast · GBEast China University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ConspectusMicrokinetic modeling based on density functional theory (DFT) energies plays an essential role in heterogeneous catalysis because it reveals the fundamental chemistry for catalytic reactions and bridges the microscopic understanding from theoretical calculations and experimental observations. Microkinetic modeling requires building a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) based on the calculation results of thermodynamic properties of adsorbates and kinetic parameters for the reaction elementary steps. Solving a microkinetic model can extract information on catalytic chemistry, including critical reaction intermediates, reaction pathways, the surface species distribution, activity, and selectivity, thus providing vital guidelines for altering catalysts.However, the quantitative reliability of traditional microkinetic models is often insufficient to conclusively extrapolate the mechanistic details of complex reaction systems. This can be attributed to several factors, the most important of which is the limitation of obtaining an accurate estimation of the energy inputs via traditional calculation methods. These limitations include the difficulty of using static DFT methods to calculate reaction energies of adsorption/desorption processes, often rate-controlling or selectivity-determining steps, and the inadequate consideration of surface coverage effects. In addition, the robust microkinetic software is rare, which also complicates the resolution of complex catalytic systems.In this Account, we review our recent works toward refining the predictions of microkinetic modeling in heterogeneous catalysis and achieving theory-experiment parity for activity and selectivity. First, we introduce CATKINAS, a microkinetic software developed in our group, and show how it disentangles the problem that traditional microkinetic software has and how it can now be applied to obtain kinetic results for more sophisticated reaction systems. Second, we describe a molecular dynamics method developed recently to obtain the free-energy changes for the adsorption/desorption process to fill in the missing energy inputs. Third, we show that a rigorous consideration of surface coverage effects is pivotal for building more realistic models and obtaining accurate kinetic results. Following a series of studies on acetylene hydrogenation reactions on Pd catalysts, we demonstrate how this new approach can provide an improved quantitative understanding of the mechanism, active site, and intrinsic structural sensitivity. Finally, we conclude with a brief outlook and the remaining challenges in this field.

Identifiers

PMID35442027
PMCPMC9069691
OpenAlexW4224259747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.