Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35442008›Full record

ReviewAmbio2022

Community experiences of landscape-based stormwater management practices: A review.

Yuanqiu Feng, Joan Nassauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuanqiu FengSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Dana Building, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. yuanqiu@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-7723
Joan NassauerSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Dana Building, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

US National Science Foundation SCC-IRF 1737432. Overcoming Social Technical Barriers for the Broad Adoption of Smart Stormwater Systems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban stormwater management increasingly changes urban landscapes. From rain gardens to stormwater ponds, landscape-based practices are visible and often accessible to community members, whose support and experience of these practices will affect their success. This critical narrative review addresses these Landscape-based Stormwater Management Practices (L-SWMPs). It assesses quantitative and qualitative evidence for the effects of characteristics of individual community members, L-SWMP landscape context, and L-SWMPs themselves on community members' perceptions, attitudes, and societal outcomes. Characteristics of community members are most well-studied. Environmental knowledge and past experiences of community members have strong, consistent effects, while the effects of demographic characteristics are weaker and inconsistent. Landscape characteristics, especially greenspace context and neighborhood landscape norms, consistently influence perceptions of L-SWMPs as amenities. Effects of noticeable L-SWMP characteristics are understudied; we argue that paying greater attention to these characteristics may help practitioners innovate L-SWMPs that benefit communities and receive their support.

Indexed as

GardensRainCity PlanningConservation of Natural ResourcesUrbanizationDesignGreen infrastructureNature-based solutionPublic preferenceSocial dimensionUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID35442008
PMCPMC9200919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.