ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022
Perioperative cell-free DNA trends predict recurrence of non-metastatic colorectal cancer significantly earlier than CEA trends over the first 2 years post-operatively in stage II and stage III colon cancer.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum markers CEA, CA50, CA19-9, CA72-4, and CYFRA21-1 in colon cancer.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Role of Cell-free DNA as a Non-Invasive Biomarker in the Detection of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2025Article
- A cell-free DNA colorectal cancer screening test promising enhanced accessibility and early detection.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of perioperative ΔcfDNA to ΔCEA (over the first 2 years post-operatively) for identifying disease recurrence in colon cancer.
methodsPatients presenting for elective resection for colon cancer with curative intent were screened for inclusion. Perioperative cfDNA levels were measured at seven different times points(pre-operative and post-operative at 3 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, POD3 and POD5). CEA levels were measured on the same patients up to 2 years post-operatively. Change in trend (Δ) was defined as the β coefficient using a logistic regression model. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 23.
resultsLongitudinal data on twenty-two patients were analysed (n = 16 male, n = 6 female) for a median of 29 months (IQR 23 months) during which time three patients developed (distant) recurrence. Perioperative ΔcfDNA at 48Hrs, POD3 and POD5 were significantly associated with early recurrence. ΔCEA was significantly associated with early recurrence at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively, only when disease recurrence was macroscopically established. ΔcfDNA was associated with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.947 (95% CI 0.88-1.0, p < 0.001) and ΔCEA was associated with an AUC of 0.9382 (95%CI 0.88-0.99, p < 0.0001). This translated into a specificity of 97% (95%CI 86.51-99.87%) for ΔcfDNA and 77.5% sensitivity (95%CI 62.5-87.7%) in the immediate perioperative period and an 88.9% specificity (95%CI 56.5-99.4%) and 76.5% sensitivity (95%CI 63.24-86%) for ΔCEA over the first 2 years post-operatively.
conclusionsIn this pilot study, following curative resection for colon cancer changing trends in perioperative cfDNA (ΔcfDNA) identify those at risk of recurrent disease before recurrence develops which is at least 6 months earlier than CEA changes (ΔCEA) which are only observed when recurrence is established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.