ArticleJournal of oral rehabilitation2022
Effect of apical microsurgery on force regulation of incisor teeth during unpredictable force control task.
Article in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food Hardness Modulates Behavior, Cognition, and Brain Activation: A Systematic Review of Animal and Human Studies.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of apical microsurgery on force regulation of incisor teeth during unpredictable force control task.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApical microsurgery (AMS) involves removal of the root-end which can affect the force regulation of teeth.
objectiveTo investigate the force regulation of incisor teeth treated with AMS during the unpredictable force control task in comparison with their contralateral teeth with complete root apices, in humans.
methodsFifteen eligible participants (8 women and 7 men; mean age 52.9 ± SD 4.4 years) performed a standardised unpredictable force control task, which involved pulling and holding a force transducer with AMS-treated incisors and their contralateral control teeth (n = 30 teeth). A series of four load masses: 100, 200, 50 and 300 gm were attached to the force transducer through a string in an unpredictable manner. The obtained force profile was divided into initial and later time-segments. The peak force and peak force rate during the initial time-segment, and the holding force and coefficient of variability during the later time-segments were calculated and compared by the repeated measures analysis of variance.
resultsDuring the initial time-segment, the peak force and peak force rate were significantly lower in the AMS-treated teeth than in the controls (p = .001, p = .013, respectively). However, during the later time-segment, no significant differences in the holding force nor the coefficient of variability were observed between the AMS-treated teeth and their controls (p = .755, p = .213, respectively).
conclusionIn contrast to incisors with complete normal root apices, AMS-treated incisors do not show robust changes in force regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.