ReviewDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2022
Common data elements to standardize genomics studies in cerebral palsy.
Review in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole genome sequencing in cerebral palsy: a UK paediatric pilot study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Toward a Common Set of Interface Requirements for Genomic Data Management: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Genetic testing in cerebral palsy with clinical and neuroimaging variables.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Common data elements for food allergy clinical trials: an overview.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Application of the Delphi method to the development of common data elements for social drivers of health: A systematic scoping review.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Redefining cerebral palsies as a diverse group of neurodevelopmental disorders with genetic aetiology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Common data elements and minimum data sets in cerebral palsy: Start small to grow big.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2022Article
- Common data elements to standardize genomics studies in cerebral palsy.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo define clinical common data elements (CDEs) and a mandatory minimum data set (MDS) for genomic studies of cerebral palsy (CP).
methodCandidate data elements were collated following a review of the literature and existing CDEs. An online, three-round Delphi survey was used to rate each data element as either 'core', 'recommended', 'exploratory', or 'not required'. Members of the International Cerebral Palsy Genomics Consortium (ICPGC) rated the core CDEs as either mandatory or not, to form the MDS. For both the CDEs and the MDS, a data element was considered to have reached consensus if more than 75% of respondents agreed.
resultsForty-six individuals from around the world formed the Delphi panel: consumers (n=2), scientists/researchers (n=17), medical (n=19), and allied health professionals (n=8). The CDEs include 107 data elements across six categories: demographics, diagnostics, family history, antenatal and neonatal details, clinical traits, and CP-specific assessments. Of these, 10 are mandatory, 42 core, 41 recommended, and 14 are exploratory.
interpretationThe ICPGC CDEs provide a foundation for the standardization of phenotype data captured in CP genomic studies and will benefit international collaborations and pooling of data, particularly in rare conditions. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A set of 107 common data elements (CDEs) for genomics studies in cerebral palsy is provided. The CDEs include standard definitions and data values domains. The CDEs will facilitate international data sharing, collaboration, and improved clinical interpretation of findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.