Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35441676›Full record

SynthesisBioscience reports2022

MicroRNA-21 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wei Wang, Xinyao Li, Chengfei Liu, Xin Zhang, Ying Wu, Mingxin Diao, Siyu Tan, Shubin Huang, Yin Cheng, Tao You

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bioscience reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Wang *Department of Cardiac Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xinyao Li *The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Chengfei LiuThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Xin ZhangGansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Ying WuGansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Mingxin DiaoThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Siyu TanThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Shubin HuangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yin ChengThe First Clinical Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Tao YouGansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2100-3318
First Hospital of Lanzhou University · CNGansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNAnhui Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between microRNA-21 (miRNA-21) and pathogenesis of lung cancer is a considerable focus of research interest. However, to our knowledge, no in-depth meta-analyses based on existing evidence to ascertain the value of miRNA-21 in diagnosis and clinical prognosis of lung cancer have been documented.

methodsWe comprehensively searched all the literature pertaining to 'miRNA-21' and 'lung cancer' from four databases from the period of inception of each database until May 2020. Using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature for inclusion was identified and the necessary data extracted.

resultsIn total, 46 articles were included in the meta-analysis, among which 31 focused on diagnostic value and 15 on prognostic value. Combined sensitivity (SEN) of miRNA-21 in diagnosis of lung cancer was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.81), specificity (SPE) was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was (95% CI: 12-33), and area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). No significant correlations were observed between abnormal expression of miRNA-21 and gender, smoking habits, pathological type and clinical stage of lung cancer (P>0.05). In terms of overall survival (OS), univariate analysis (hazards ratio (HR) = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.22-1.82) revealed high expression of miRNA-21 as an influencing factor for lung cancer. MiRNA-21 was confirmed as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.24-2.19).

conclusionMiRNA-21 has potential clinical value in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer and may serve as an effective diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in the future.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, humanDiagnosismeta analysisMicroRNA-21Prognosis

Identifiers

PMID35441676
PMCPMC9093699
OpenAlexW4224254064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.