ArticleESC heart failure2022
The trajectory of renal function following mechanical circulatory support and subsequent heart transplantation.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The interplay between pulsatility, sympathetic regulation and renal physiology: Implications for left ventricular assist devices.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Prediction of Kidney Function Improvement After Heart Transplantation.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- How to Enhance Cardiorenal Benefits in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure?International journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- AI driven mechanical circulatory support: Can AI and Impella team up to beat cardiogenic shock.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Kidney health and function with left ventricular assist devices.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2023Review
- Heart transplantation in patients bridged with mechanical circulatory support: outcome comparison with matched controls.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- The trajectory of renal function following mechanical circulatory support and subsequent heart transplantation.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimPatients with advanced heart failure (HF) frequently suffer from renal insufficiency. The impact of durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and subsequent heart transplantation (HTx) on kidney function is not well described. METHODS AND
resultsWe studied patients with advanced HF who received durable MCS as bridge to transplantation (BTT) and underwent subsequent HTx at our centre between 1996 and 2018. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by
conclusionsIn patients with advanced heart failure, measured GFR improved after MCS with no difference between pulsatile and CF-pumps. The total study group showed no further increase in GFR following HTx, but in certain subgroups, including patients aged 35-54 years and those treated during the latest era (2012-2018), renal function appeared to improve after transplant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.