ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022
Effectiveness of Ilizarov Ankle Arthrodesis in the Treatment of End-Stage Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Semi-Automatic MRI Segmentation for Assessing Cartilage Volume Changes After Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty Using the Ilizarov Frame for Ankle Osteoarthritis.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Article
- Optimizing Outcomes in Distal Tibial Deformity Correction: The Role of Supramalleolar Osteotomy with Computer-assisted Hexapod External Fixator.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the outcomes of Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of end-stage varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA).
methodsThis was a retrospective study of 63 patients with varus ankle OA who underwent Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis between June 2013 and December 2018. There were 24 males and 39 females with an average age of 56.57 ± 4.45 years (range, 47-64 years). Thirty-six cases were affected on the left side, and 27 were affected on the right side. The patients' mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.18 ± 2.93 kg/m
resultsThe average operation time was 147.84 ± 13.67 min (range, 135-168 min). The average follow-up time was 34.24 ± 8.72 months (range, 24-61 months). Bony fusion was achieved in all ankles, and the fusion time was 12.43 ± 1.99 weeks on average. The average AOFAS score at the final follow-up increased from 42.14 ± 8.66 to 80.90 ± 6.80. The average VAS score and AOS pain and disability scores at the final follow-up decreased from 7.29 ± 1.27 to 2.24 ± 0.94, from 67.94 ± 7.68 to 27.92 ± 5.82, and from 71.64 ± 9.37 to 41.32 ± 8.99, respectively. The average TAS, CPT, and TLS at the final follow-up increased from 77.76° ± 4.44° to 89.81° ± 1.25°, from 69.04° ± 3.73° to 90.43° ± 1.80°, and from 82.14° ± 3.77° to 88.67° ± 2.50°, respectively. The average TT and DA at the final follow-up decreased from 8.76° ± 4.30° to 2.05° ± 1.28° and from 20.95° ± 3.73° to 1.57° ± 0.93°, respectively. Three patients developed superficial pin tract infections, all settled with local dressing and antibiotic treatment. Two patients were found to have subtalar arthritis and underwent conservative treatment.
conclusionAnkle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique is efficient in treating end-stage varus ankle OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.