Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35441428›Full record

ArticleANZ journal of surgery2022

Regional variation in post-operative mortality in New Zealand.

Jason K Gurney, Melissa McLeod, James Stanley, Bridget Robson, Douglas Campbell, Elizabeth Dennett, Dick Ongley, Juliet Rumball-Smith, Diana Sarfati, Jonathan Koea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jason K GurneyDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7615-0748
Melissa McLeodDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
James StanleyDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Bridget RobsonDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Douglas CampbellAuckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Elizabeth DennettCapital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
Dick OngleyCanterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Juliet Rumball-SmithMinistry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
Diana SarfatiTe Aho o Te Kahu - Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jonathan KoeaWaitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8833-5603

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 18/037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing body of evidence that access to best practice perioperative care varies within our population. In this study, we use national-level data to begin to address gaps in our understanding of regional variation in post-operative outcomes within New Zealand.

methodsUsing National Collections data, we examined all inpatient procedures in New Zealand public hospitals between 2005 and 2017 (859 171 acute, 2 276 986 elective/waiting list), and identified deaths within 30 days. We calculated crude and adjusted rates per 100 procedures for the 20 district health boards (DHBs), both for the total population and stratified by ethnicity (Māori/European). Odds ratios comparing the risk of post-operative mortality between Māori and European patients were calculated using crude and adjusted Poisson regression models.

resultsWe observed regional variations in post-operative mortality outcomes. Māori, compared to European, patients experienced higher post-operative mortality rates in several DHBs, with a trend to higher mortality in almost all DHBs. Regional variation in patterns of age, procedure, deprivation and comorbidity (in particular) largely drives regional variation in post-operative mortality, although variation persists in some regions even after adjusting for these factors. Inequitable outcomes for Māori also persist in several regions despite adjustment for multiple factors, particularly in the elective setting.

conclusionsThe persistence of variation and ethnic disparities in spite of adjustment for confounding and mediating factors suggests that multiple regions require additional resource and support to improve outcomes. Efforts to reduce variation and improve outcomes for patients will require both central planning and monitoring, as well as region-specific intervention.

Indexed as

EthnicityComorbidityHumansNew ZealandPostoperative Perioddisparityinequityperioperative mortalitypost-operative mortalityregional variation

Identifiers

PMID35441428
PMCPMC9321085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.