Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35441427›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2022

Invasive species do not exploit early growing seasons in burned tallgrass prairies.

Hugh Ratcliffe, Marissa Ahlering, Daren Carlson, Sara Vacek, Andrew Allstadt, Laura E Dee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Invasive species do not exploit early growing seasons in burned tallgrass prairies.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hugh RatcliffeDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1667-0733
Marissa AhleringThe Nature Conservancy, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-428X
Daren CarlsonMinnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Sara VacekUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Morris, Minnesota, USA.
Andrew AllstadtUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-0834
Laura E DeeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-1371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive species management is key to conserving critically threatened native prairie ecosystems. While prescribed burning is widely demonstrated to increase native diversity and suppress invasive species, elucidating the conditions under which burning is most effective remains an ongoing focus of applied prairie ecology research. Understanding how conservation management interacts with climate is increasingly pressing, because climate change is altering weather conditions and seasonal timing around the world. Increasingly early growing seasons due to climate change are shifting the timing and availability of resources and niche space, which may disproportionately advantage invasive species and influence the outcome of burning. We estimated the effects of burning, start time of the growing season, and their interaction on invasive species relative cover and frequency, two metrics for species abundance and dominance. We used 25 observed prairie sites and 853 observations of 267 transects spread throughout Minnesota, USA from 2010 to 2019 to conduct our analysis. Here, we show that burning reduced the abundance of invasive cool-season grasses, leading to reduced abundance of invasive species as a whole. This reduction persisted over time for invasive cover but quickly waned for their frequency of occurrence. Additionally, and contrary to expectations that early growing season starts benefit invasive species, we found evidence that later growing season starts increased the abundance of some invasive species. However, the effects of burning on plant communities were largely unaltered by the timing of the growing season, although earlier growing season starts weakened the effectiveness of burning on Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis), two of the most dominant invasive species in the region. Our results suggest that prescribed burning will likely continue to be a useful conservation tool in the context of earlier growing season starts, and that changes to growing season timing will not be a primary mechanism driving increased invasion due to climate change in these ecosystems. We propose that future research seek to better understand abiotic controls on invasive species phenology in managed systems and how burning intensity and timing interact with spring conditions.

Indexed as

EcosystemIntroduced SpeciesGrasslandPoaceaeSeasonsclimate adaptationclimate changegrassland managementgrowing seasonphenologyprescribed burningspring timing

Identifiers

PMID35441427
PMCPMC13425689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.