ArticleProteins2022
Multi-layer sequential network analysis improves protein 3D structural classification.
Article in Proteins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unavailability of experimental 3D structural data on protein folding dynamics and necessity for a new generation of structure prediction methods in this context.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- The power and limits of predicting inter-protein exon-exon interactions using protein 3D structures.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Transcription factor prediction using protein 3D secondary structures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Prognostic importance of splicing-triggered aberrations of protein complex interfaces in cancer.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Current and future directions in network biology.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein structural classification (PSC) is a supervised problem of assigning proteins into pre-defined structural (e.g., CATH or SCOPe) classes based on the proteins' sequence or 3D structural features. We recently proposed PSC approaches that model protein 3D structures as protein structure networks (PSNs) and analyze PSN-based protein features, which performed better than or comparable to state-of-the-art sequence or other 3D structure-based PSC approaches. However, existing PSN-based PSC approaches model the whole 3D structure of a protein as a static (i.e., single-layer) PSN. Because folding of a protein is a dynamic process, where some parts (i.e., sub-structures) of a protein fold before others, modeling the 3D structure of a protein as a PSN that captures the sub-structures might further help improve the existing PSC performance. Here, we propose to model 3D structures of proteins as multi-layer sequential PSNs that approximate 3D sub-structures of proteins, with the hypothesis that this will improve upon the current state-of-the-art PSC approaches that are based on single-layer PSNs (and thus upon the existing state-of-the-art sequence and other 3D structural approaches). Indeed, we confirm this on 72 datasets spanning ~44 000 CATH and SCOPe protein domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.